| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 1881 2013 SLD 1881 2013 PLC 934 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No.165 of 2000, decision dated: 9-10-2012
RAJA SAEED AKRAM KHAN AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD SADIQ KHAN, JJ
Asghar Ali Malik, Advocate for Appellants. Nemo No. 1.
Civil Appeal No.165 of 2000, decision dated: 9-10-2012
RAJA SAEED AKRAM KHAN AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD SADIQ KHAN, JJ
Asghar Ali Malik, Advocate for Appellants. Nemo No. 1.
AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 2 othersVsMUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1977--- ----Rr. 3, 4 & 6---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act (XXII of 1975), S.4---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Ss.44 & 47---Civil service---Reversion and dismissal from service---Writ petition before High Court---Maintainability---Three appeals filed by the employee against order of his reversion were pending before Service Tribunal when he was dismissed from service---Employee, later on withdrew said appeals and filed writ petition to challenge all orders, including the order of his dismissal from service---When cause of action arose to the employee in respect of his reversion order, his appeals before the Service Tribunal were maintainable; and it was only the Service Tribunal which had jurisdiction to decide, whether the reversion orders were validly passed or not---Dismissal of the employee from the service, did not have the effect of taking away the jurisdiction from the Service Tribunal to decide appeals---Employee, in circumstances, had wrongly withdrew the appeals from the Service Tribunal---According to S.47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain a dispute over which the Service Tribunal had the exclusive jurisdiction---High Court was to first determine the question of its jurisdiction before passing the impugned ---Writ petition filed by the employee in respect of his reversion order before High Court was not maintainable. Sardar Muhammad Ayub Khan v. Secretary S&GAD and 4 others 2000 YLR 2868; Chairman M.D.A. Mirpur and 4 others v. Muhammad Ajmal Qureshi and another 2001 PLC (C.S.) 127; Alam Din v. Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Mirpur and 4 others 2000 YLR 189; Muhammad Ajaib v. Public Service Commission and 3 others 1997 PLC (C.S.) 222; Aisha Hameed Qadri v. Nomination Board and 6 others 1997 CLC 1713; Muhammad Arshad Khan v. Chairman MDA and 6 others 1997 MLD 3066; Muhammad Siddique Farooqi v. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad and 3 others PLD 1994 SC (AJ&K) 13; Qurban Hussain v. Mst. Bashir Begum and 6 others PLD 1987 SC…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492