Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 1612 2011 SLD 1612 2011 PLC 229
National Industrial Relations Commission
No.4A(153)/2010-K, 24(176)/2010/K, decision dated: 1st March, 2011.
BASHIR AHMED MEMON, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED through G.M.

VS

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION and 4 others PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED through G.M. vs PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION and 4 others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008)-------Ss. 25(8)(g) & 50---Petition had been brought by the management against trade unions registered in the establishment---Interim prohibitory order was passed restraining the trade unions from resorting to strike/cessation of work, slogan raising, demonstration, using of abusive language etc.---Service on trade unions was held good, but none appeared and even other unions who were served, remained absent---All unions who remained absent, despite repeated notices, were proceeded ex parte---Management filed affidavit-in-evidence by way of ex parte proof, wherein it reiterated the entire facts of the case, which were mentioned in the petition and also had appended photographs in support of their contention---Since no rebuttal had been received from the unions, petition of management stood allowed. Faisal Mahmood Ghani for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. ORDER BASHIR AHMED MEMON (MEMBER).--- The present petition was brought by the petitioner management under section 25(8)(g) read with section 50 of the Industrial Relations (Revival and Amendment) Act, 2010 against five trade unions registered in the petitioner establishment. 2. Brief facts as stated in the petition are that the petitioner company is recently privatized company with major foreign investment and is engaged in the business of telecommunication in Pakistan and has its offices, branches, installations and workmen throughout the country. Respondent No.1 was last CBA on the basis of judgment of Full Bench of NIRC announced on 26-10-2005 in Appeals Nos.12(05)/2004 and 12(7)/2004, whereas the remaining respondents are registered trade unions as industry-wise with NIRC. It is stated that the respondent No.1 union received highest number of votes in the last referendum and result has been challenged in the honourable Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in W.P. No.1684/2010 who by order dated 22-4-2010 has restrained the issuance of CBA certificate as there is a dispute about the officers of this trade union. It is stated that respondent No.2 union received second number of votes in the referendum and it seeks fresh polls between two unions which polled the…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492