Case Details

Citation(s)
2012 SLG 3194 2012 SLD 3194 (2012) 343 ITR 141
Delhi High Court
IT APPEAL NOS. 52 & 87 OF 2010 NOVEMBER 11, 2011
SANJIV KHANNA AND R.V. EASWAR, JJ.
Kaanan Kapur for the Appellant. Kamal Sawhney for the
Respondent.

Atma Ram Properties (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of IncomE tax

Law:

Section:

Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Income escaping assessment - Non-disclosure of primary facts - Assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01 - Whether requirement of section 147 is that assessee should have failed or omitted to make full and true disclosure of material facts; assessee is not required to disclose, state or explain law - Held, yes - Whether where assessee had furnished full and true details, lapse or error on part of Assessing Officer to apply law to said facts can be attributed and regarded as a failure on part of the assessee to make full and true disclosure of material facts in original assessment proceedings - Held, no - Whether Explanation 1 to section 147 deals with failure of Assessing Officer to discover or infer all material facts on basis of books of account or other evidence produced by assessee; failure to apply law or a section to admitted facts on record is not covered by Explanation 1 - Held, yes - For assessment year 2001-02, Assessing Officer made addition of certain amount under section 2(22)(e) as deemed dividend being amount advanced by group company to assessee- On appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) reduced addition to amount advanced during that year and deleted addition representing amount advanced in earlier years - Thereupon, Assessing Officer reopened assessments of assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001and made addition under section 2(22)(e) - Whether since for assessment year 1999-2000, all facts were already known and on record and lapse was on part of Assessing Officer in not invoking section 2(22)(e), reopening of assessment for that year was unjustified - Held, yes - Whether, however, since proceedings for assessment year 2000-01 were never initiated and books of account and other material were not produced before Assessing Officer, order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the assessment year 2001-02 would constitute information or material from any external source and, therefore, reopening of assessment for that year was justified - Held, yes [Partly in favour of assessee] FACTS For the assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, the assessee-company filed returns of income declaring certain income. For the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492