| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2013 SLG 1890 2013 SLD 1890 2013 YLR 248 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Bail Application No.S-95 and Criminal Transfer Application No.21 of 2012 and Connected with Bail Application No.S-573 and S-610 of 2011, decision dated: 9-07-2012
SHAHID ANWAR BAJWA, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Bail Application No.S-95 and Criminal Transfer Application No.21 of 2012 and Connected with Bail Application No.S-573 and S-610 of 2011, decision dated: 9-07-2012
SHAHID ANWAR BAJWA, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SHAIKH MUHAMMAD and another--Applicants
VS
THE STATE and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 497(2) & 526---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 322---Qatl-bis-sabab---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Transfer of case---Determining time of death of deceased---Method---Scope---Allegation against the accused persons was that they committed rape with the victim and took her photographs with a mobile phone before murdering her---Victim's body was found in a well---Contentions of the accused persons were that investigation into the case revealed that the victim's family suspected her of having illicit relations with the accused persons because of which she was murdered by her own family; that post-mortem report of the victim indicated that her death had occurred at about 11 am, whereas the F.I.R. alleged that it had occurred at about 8 am, and that pre-arrest bail application of the accused persons was refused by Trial Court with observations that showed a predisposition of mind, therefore, the case should be transferred to any other court---Contention of the complainant party was that they had not murdered the victim for allegedly having illicit relations with the accused persons because if that was the case then under the tradition of Karo Kari both the victim and accused persons would have been murdered---Validity---Contention of the complainant party regarding Karo Kari was of no relevance because it would be axiomatic to say that if only one was murdered and not both, the story must not be believed---Regarding contention of accused persons with regard to time of death, normal method of determining time of death was through measurement of body temperature and state of rigor mortis---When at the time of recovery, body was not in ambient temperature but either had elevated or reduced temperature, the rigor mortis and drop in temperature would vary accordingly---Since in the present case body was recovered from a well, therefore, it was yet to be seen whether the time described in the postmortem report, for water in a well in the month of July, was a true indicator of the time of death giving the fact that temperature of water was less than the temperature of air---Mobile phone with which the accused persons…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492