| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 1350 2012 SLD 1350 (2012) 106 TAX 171 2012 PTCL 598 (2012) 106 TAX 56 2012 PTD 798 |
Lahore High Court
I.C.As. Nos. 257 to 259, 266 to 268, 275, 276, 278 to 281, 287, 312 to 316, 285, 286, 273, 296, 288, 344, 345, 298 of 2011, decision dated: 27-06-2011
UMAR ATA BANDIAL AND ASAD MUNIR, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
I.C.As. Nos. 257 to 259, 266 to 268, 275, 276, 278 to 281, 287, 312 to 316, 285, 286, 273, 296, 288, 344, 345, 298 of 2011, decision dated: 27-06-2011
UMAR ATA BANDIAL AND ASAD MUNIR, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
CHAUDHRY SUGAR MILLS LTD
VS
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others
Law: Federal Excise Act, 2005
Section: 3,3A
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 73,73(1)
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 22
[Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005)].........S 3A---Notification S.R.O. No.655(I)/07, dated 29-6-2007---General Order No.3, dated 30-7-2007---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.22---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.73---Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1973), S.3---Additional levy---Scope---Grievance of appellants was that levy as "special excise duty" could not be imposed by authorities on the basis of notification issued by them---Validity---On the day a Money Bill was passed, it was validly made law but one that would come into force not latter than ten days from the date of its presentation for Presidential assent---In terms of proviso to Art. 73(1) of the Constitution, Finance Bill was Money Bill that contained Annual Budget statement for that year, therefore, duly passed Finance Bill, 2007, was valid legislation which could be analogized with "passed" Act for the purposes of S. 22 of General Clauses Act, 1897---Word "additional" did not alter character of levy imposed under S. 3-A of Federal Excise Act, 2005---Nor did name of levy as "special excise duty" made it distinct from levy of "duties of excise" that Federal Government could lawfully impose under Federal Legislative List---Whether it was additional or special, levy remained the same, i.e. excise duty---Division Bench of High Court declined to interfere in the passed by Single Judge of High Court---Intra Court Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Sohail Jute Mills' Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance and others PLD 1991 SC 329 rel (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art.73---Money bill---Presidential assent---Bill passed was valid legislation which could be analogized with "passed" Act for the purpose of S.22, General Clauses Act, 1897---Principles. ORDER UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J.---This order shall dispose of I.C.A. No. 257-2011, I.C.A. No.258-2011, I.C.A. No.259-2011, I.C.A. No.266-2011 I.C.A. No.267-2011, I.C.A. No.268-2011, I.C.A. No.275-2011, I.C.A. No.276-2011, I.C.A. No.278-2011, I.C.A. No.279-2011, I.C.A. No.280-2011, I.C.A. No.281-2011, I.C.A. No.287-2011, I.C.A. No.312-2011, I.C.A. No.313-2011, I.C.A. No.314-2011 I.C.A. No.315-2011, I.C.A. No.316-2011, I.C.A.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492