Case Details

Citation(s)
1972 SLG 423 1972 SLD 423 (1972) 83 ITR 256
Bombay High Court
IT REFERENCE No. 83 OF 1964 JANUARY 20, 1971
KOTVAL, C.J. AND CHANDRACHUD, J.
R.J. Kola and F.N. Kaka for the Applicant. R.M. Hajarnavis and R.J. Joshi for the
Respondent.

Karsondas Ranchhoddas

v.

Commissioner of IncomE tax

Law:

Section:

Section 28(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Corresponding to section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Business loss - Allowable as - Assessment years 1956-57, 1958-59 and 1959-60 - Whether previous decision that assessee's holding constituted his stock-in-trade will not preclude a finding that for any subsequent year he held shares as capital investment but for purpose of deciding question whether assessee is a dealer in shares, Tribunal must take into account all materials facts which were before it - Held, yes - Whether where previous and subsequent orders of assessment, which were good and cogent evidence, showed that in relevant assessment years assessee was a dealer in shares and there was nothing on record to justify view that assessee who was a dealer in shares since 1942-43 became an investor during intervening years under reference, losses claimed by assessee in purchase and sale of shares had to be allowed as business loss - Held, yes FACTS The assessee had been dealing in shares since 1941 and for the assessment years 1942-43 to 1947-48 the profits made on the sale of shares were taxed as business profits till. In his hands. Since then there were no sale transactions. Till in the assessment year 1954-55, the assessee showed a loss of on the sale of shares and the High Court allowed it as a business loss. For the assessment year 1955-56 the loss incurred by the assessee was allowed by the AAC. For the assessment years 1956-57, 1958-59 and 1959-60, the assessee claimed loss on sale of shares purchased between the years 1944 to 1947, while for the assessment year 1957-58, the profit shown on sale of shares was taxed as business profit. The same was the case for the assessment year 1960-61. The ITO rejected the claim on the grounds (1) that the assessee was not carrying on any business in shares; (2) that he had purchased those shares 10 or 11 years before the date of sale; (3) that there was no continuity or repetition of sale transactions for a considerable period of time and it could not therefore be said that he was doing a regular business of purchasing and selling shares during accounting year; (4)that the investments were large and the…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492