| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2012 SLG 2250 2012 SLD 2250 2012 CLD 1133 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.2377 of 2011, decision dated: 30-01-2012.
MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, J
Shahid Ikram Siddiqui for Petitioner. Abdul Hameed Chohan for
Respondent No. 2. Imran Muhammad Sarwar for
Respondent No. 3.
Writ Petition No.2377 of 2011, decision dated: 30-01-2012.
MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, J
Shahid Ikram Siddiqui for Petitioner. Abdul Hameed Chohan for
Respondent No. 2. Imran Muhammad Sarwar for
Respondent No. 3.
Sheikh NIAZ ANJUM
VS
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, Islamabad High Court High Court through Secretary and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)---S. 2--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Allegations of Bank default and misappropriation of pledged stock---Name of accused placed in Exit Control List---Validity---Order of High Court passed in the matter showed that pledged stock was sold by the Bank to accused against the payment of Rs.140 million under the supervision of the High Court, therefore, it could not be said that accused had misappropriated the stock---Order of High Court also showed that in its plaint Bank had not mentioned anything concerning the misappropriation of pledged stock and it seemed Bank was trying to blackmail the accused--Authorities. had wrongly entered the name of the accused in the Exit Control List, which was against his fundamental rights---Accused had the right and constitutional protection for travelling abroad in connection with his business---Constitutional petition was allowed and authorities were directed to delete the name of the accused from the Exit Control List. Munir Ahmad Bhatti v. Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Interior through Secretary and others PLD 2010 Lah. 697 and Mian Tahir Jahangir v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and another 2008 YLR 1857 fol. ORDER MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, J.---The petitioner is the Chief Executive/shareholder of limited company known as Messrs Anmol Textile Mills Limited. The said company raised financial facility from respondent No.3 for running its business against acceptable securities. Respondent No.3 filed a suit for recovery of outstanding finance against the company and petitioner. The said suit is pending disposal before the competent court of law. Respondent No.1 has placed the name of petitioner in Exit Control List on the request of respondent No.3 due to pendency of civil suit. 2. The petitioner has challenged the act of respondent No. 3 for deleting his name from the Exit Control List (ECL). 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner wants to travel abroad in connection with his business promotion and as such he is feeling difficulty to travel abroad. Learned counsel…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492