Case Details

Citation(s)
2011 SLG 1662 2011 SLD 1662 2011 PLC 368
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeal No.KAR-37 of 2011, decision dated: 19-05-2011.
JUSTICE (RTD.) ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD AHMED KHAN

VS

SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.IV through Presiding Officer and another MUHAMMAD AHMED KHAN vs SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.IV through Presiding Officer and another

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008)-------Ss. 41, 54(3) & 55---Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O.12---Termination of service---Grievance petition---Services of the employee were terminated on medical ground in view of certificate issued by Medical Board constituted by the Civil Surgeon---Medical Board had declared the employee unfit for operating heavy machine---Reason as given in the termination letter was very clear, simple and unambiguous---No objection was taken by the employee, either to the constitution of the Medical Board or to its report, which meant that employee had agreed with the report---Reasons given in the termination letter being in consonance with the provisions of Standing Order 12 of Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, Labour Court had rightly dismissed grievance petition by the employee---Findings of the Labour Court could not be interfered with in appeal, in circumstances. Muhammad Siddique Malik for Appellant. Mehmood Abdul Ghani for Respondent No.2. Dates of hearing: 4th and 31st March, 2011. DECISION JUSTICE (RTD.) ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH (MEMBER).--- Through this decision I intend to dispose of Appeal No.KAR-37 of 2011 as preferred by the appellant worker namely Muhammad Ahmed Khan against the decision passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No. IV, Karachi, dated 28-5-2010 by which the Grievance Petition No.220 of 2009 under section 41 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 was dismissed. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was employed with the establishment of respondent No.2 as RTG Crane Operator since 2002. During the course of employment appellant suffered with eye disease, therefore, he was referred to Eye Specialist Mr. Jawed Hassan Niazi, Consultant Ophthalmologist and Eye Surgeon who diagnosed Cataract Glaucoma and performed operation of left eye on 21-1-2009. On recovery appellant resumed his duties and performed the same, so he was paid for the months of February and March, 2009. Thereafter, he was again, referred to the same Eye Surgeon who advised for three months rest. On such advise appellant was directed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492