| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2011 SLG 481 2011 SLD 481 2011 PLD 231 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 18025 of 2008, decided on 21st December, 2010. DATE of hearing: 29th September, 2010
IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, J., SH. AZMAT SAEED, CH. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, IQBAL HAMEED UR RAHMAN AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Ch. Fawad Hussain and Asif Ismail for Petitioner. Abid Hassan Minto, Jehanzeb Imran, Ashtar Ausaf Ali and Syed Najam ul Hassan Kazmi for
Respondents
Writ Petition No. 18025 of 2008, decided on 21st December, 2010. DATE of hearing: 29th September, 2010
IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, J., SH. AZMAT SAEED, CH. IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN, IQBAL HAMEED UR RAHMAN AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Ch. Fawad Hussain and Asif Ismail for Petitioner. Abid Hassan Minto, Jehanzeb Imran, Ashtar Ausaf Ali and Syed Najam ul Hassan Kazmi for
Respondents
AURANGZEB SHAAFI B-UR-KI
VS
PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 5 others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199,255(2),129,199(2)(b)(ii)
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 3(43a)
Law: Punjab Office of Ombudsman Act, 1997
Section: 3(1),3
Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act (X of 1997)--- ----S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 & 255 (2)---Constitutional Petition---Quo warranto---Appointment of Ombudsman---Oath, taking of---Petitioner assailed the notification in view whereof oath taken by respondent as Ombudsman, before Acting Governor on the ground that the same was illegal---Validity---Oath, under Art. 255 (2) of the Constitution, was required to be made before a specific person and in case it was impracticable for any reason it might be made before such other person as might be nominated by that person---Acting Governor was duly nominated by President of Pakistan to act as Governor in absence of Governor, therefore, Acting Governor was competent to administer oath to the Ombudsman---Petitioner did not challenge notification whereby Acting Governor was directed by President of Pakistan to act as Governor which showed that petitioner had admitted appointment of Acting Governor---Petitioner without challenging appointment of Acting Governor could not challenge the act of Governor which he had done after his nomination as Acting Governor---Constitutional remedy was discretionary particularly the relief claimed on the principle governing quo warranto as envisaged under Art. 199(2)(b)(ii) of the Constitution---Such discretion had to be exercised by High Court in accordance with judicial principles and not as a matter of course---In order to exercise such discretion, the conduct of petitioner was very relevant---Petition was based on mala fides and was an act motivated for ulterior considerations designed to malign and scandalize the respondents---High Court declined to interfere in the appointment of Ombudsman and oath taken by him before Acting Governor---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Al-Jehad Trust v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 1996 SC 324; Pakistan Tehrik-e-Inqilab v. Election Commission of Pakistan and 2 others 1997 MLD 3167; Arun Kumar v. Union of India and others AIR 1982 Rajasthan 67; The Tariq Transport Company v. The Sargodha Bhera Bus Service PLD 1958 SC 437; Dr. Kamal Hussain v. M. Siraj ul Islam PLD 1959 SC 42; Islamic Republic of Pakistan v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492