Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 3036 2009 SLD 3036 (2009) 316 ITR 153
Gujarat High Court
TAX APPEAL No. 71 OF 2002 JULY 18, 2008
K.A. PUJ AND R.H. SHUKLA, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Assistant Commissioner of IncomE tax-II

v.

Emmtici Engg. Ltd.*

Law:

Section:

Section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Advance tax - Interest payable by assessee - Assessment year 1987-88 - Assessing Officer charged interest from assessee-company under section 215 - On appeal, Tribunal observed that liability for charging interest under section 215 arose due to addition in total income declared by assessee and due to its acceptance of difference regarding its status - Tribunal was of view that additions made in assessment order by Assessing Officer were highly debatable and same were not foreseen at time of filing an estimate of advance tax - Tribunal further opined that assessee was under a bona fide belief that its status was that of a company in which public were substantially interested - Accordingly, Tribunal deleted interest charged under section 215 - Whether since contention of assessee was accepted by Tribunal as well as by instant Court, there was no question of charging interest from it under section 215 - Held, yes K.M. Parikh for the Appellant. R.K. Patel for the Respondent. ORDER K.A. Puj, J. - The revenue has preferred this Tax Appeal against the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 1987-88. The appeal was admitted by this Court on 11-2-2002 and the following questions of law were formulated by the Court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has substantially erred in law and on facts in holding that the assessee-company should be treated as a company where the public is substantially interested and a Public Limited Company ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has substantially erred in law and on facts in deleting the interest charged under section 215 of the Income-tax Act ?" 2. At the time of admission of this appeal, the Court had directed that the appeal is to be heard with Income-tax Reference No. 57/1998 and Tax Appeal No. 241/2000. 3. ITR No. 57/98 is already disposed of by this Court by judgment dated 20-6-2008 and the question as to whether the assessee is a company in which public are substantially interested is decided in favour of the assessee and against…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492