| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2010 SLG 915 2010 SLD 915 2010 PLJ 524 |
Lahore High Court
Crl. Appeal No. 1747 of 2003 & M.R. No. 723 of 2003, heard on 08.03.2010. Dates of hearing: 04.03.2010 & 08.03.2010.
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD ANWAR BHAUR, JUSTICE
Mr. Akhtar Hussain Bhatti, Advocate for Appellants. Raja Bakhtiyar Ali, Deputy Prosecutor General for State. Nemo for Complainant.
Crl. Appeal No. 1747 of 2003 & M.R. No. 723 of 2003, heard on 08.03.2010. Dates of hearing: 04.03.2010 & 08.03.2010.
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD ANWAR BHAUR, JUSTICE
Mr. Akhtar Hussain Bhatti, Advocate for Appellants. Raja Bakhtiyar Ali, Deputy Prosecutor General for State. Nemo for Complainant.
MUHAMMAD JAMIL AND OTHERS
VS
STATE
Law:
Section:
Testimony of injured witness-- ----Criminal Administration of Justice--An injured witness is not necessarily a truthful witness and his testimony is also subject to scrutiny in accordance with the well settled principles of Criminal Administration of Justice. 2007 SCMR 670. Benefit of doubt-- ----If there is a single doubt in the prosecution story, the benefit thereof must be given to the accused not as a matter of grace but as a matter of right. 2009 SCMR 230. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--Benefit of doubt--Presence of eye-witnesses at the place of occurrence has become doubtful--It was night-time occurrence--It was a dark night--Claim of the eye-witnesses that they witnessed the occurrence in torch's light was not believable--Recovery of Pistol and Khanjar were concerned, since ocular evidence had not been believed by Court--These recoveries has no value as the same were only corroborative in nature--Prosecution has failed to prove its case against appellant beyond any shadow of doubt--Appeal allowed. 2010 SCMR 97. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSITCE:---.----- This judgment shall dispose of Cr. A. No. 1747/2003 (Muhammad Jamil etc. vs. The State) and Murder Reference No. 723/2003 (The State vs. Muhammad Jamil etc.) sent by the learned trial Court for confirmation or otherwise of the death sentence awarded to Appellants No. 1 and 2 (Muhammad Jamil and Muhammad Asif), as both have arisen out of the same judgment dated 30.09.2003 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Okara in case F.I.R. No. 98/2002 dated 09.03.2002, registered under Sections 302/324/148/149 PPC with Police Station Saddar Renala Khurd, District Okara. 2. After conclusion of the trial, Appellants No. 1 and 2 (Muhammad Jamil and Muhammad Asif) were convicted under Section 302(b) PPC for the murder of Farman Ali and sentenced to death each, alongwith compensation/fine of Rs.50,000/- each, to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased, whereas Appellants No. 3 and 4 (Iftikhar Ahmad and Muhammad Aslam) were convicted under Section 324 PPC for causing injuries to Javaid Iqbal P.W. and sentenced to 10 years each.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492