Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 3106 2006 SLD 3106 2006 PLD 26
Federal Shariat Court
Shariat Petition No. 9/I of 2005, decided on 15th December, 2005.
CH.EJAZ YOUSAF, C.J., DR.FIDA MUHAMMAD KHAN AND SAEED-UR-REHMAN FARRUKH, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Moulvi IQBAL HAIDER

VS

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad court

Law:

Section:

(a) Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)--- ----S. 10(4)---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S.7---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 203-D & 227---Repugnancy to Injunctions of Islam---Petitioner had challenged vires of S.10(4) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 as well as S.7 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, on the ground that those were repugnant to Injunctions of Qur'an and Sunnah; as those carried the sentence of death as 'Tazir' without keeping in view prescribed standard of Tazkiya-Tush-Shuhud---Petitioner had prayed that both S.10(4) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance, 1979 and S.7, Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 be declared as repugnant to Injunctions of Islam and prayed for suspension of sentence awarded under the said sections---Contentions raised by petitioner were devoid of force as Verses of Holy Qur'an quoted by him did not at all pertain to issue under consideration---Said Verses in no way dealt, by any stretch of imagination, with the question of compoundability of punishment awarded under 'Tazir' by a Court of law---Term 'Tazir' was used for punishment which was not fixed by Holy Qur'an and Sunnah and was left to discretion of Head of State, Majlis-e-Shoora or Qazi and was based on principles laid down by Holy Qur'an and Sunnah---In fact it was a penal punishment which was actually a reformative, deterrent and punitive measure for those offences for which no Hadd punishment had been laid down in Shariat---Such punishments were considered by Muslim jurists throughout, to be in harmony with Hadd as they aimed at correction and eradication of various criminal/moral acts or Social evils---Tazkiya-Tush-Shuhud, though desired, was not a mandatory requirement for cases wherein Tazir punishment was awarded---Courts were to determine credibility of witnesses and to properly appreciate evidence on record before awarding any punishment to accused---Petitioner could not make any specific reference to any Verse of Holy Qur'an nor could cite any from Sunnah of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) to support his contentions---Petition being not maintainable, was dismissed, in circumstances.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492