| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2003 SLG 1005 2003 SLD 1005 2003 SCMR 921 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 491-L of 2002, decided on 7th May, 2002. (On appeal from the judgment., dated 7-12-2001 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 24994 of 2000)
TANVIR AHMED KHAN AND KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, JJ
Muhammad Saleem Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
Civil Petition No. 491-L of 2002, decided on 7th May, 2002. (On appeal from the judgment., dated 7-12-2001 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 24994 of 2000)
TANVIR AHMED KHAN AND KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, JJ
Muhammad Saleem Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
REHMAT BIBI and others
VS
MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3),189
Law: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, (XVII of 1967)
Section: 42,45
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--- ----Arts: 185(3) & 189---West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Ss.42 & 45---Judgment of Supreme Court ---Implementation--Mutation of inheritance, review of---Dispute between the parties was finally settled by Supreme Court and the respondents were held to be entitled to inherit the suit property---Revenue Authorities made the necessary changes in the Revenue Record---Petitioners assailed the orders of the Revenue Authorities before High Court in Constitutional jurisdiction on the ground that since the mutation had been effected in favour of the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents, the land ,in question had changed different hands and the area and status of land had undergone changes even because of consolidation proceedings---High Court after taking notice of all the developments vis-a-vis the land in question concluded that the petitioners could raise the points before the Revenue Authorities entrusted with the obligation of reviewing the. mutations---High Court had further observed that if the petitioners or any one else was aggrieved of any decision by the Revenue Authorities then the petitioners could have the fora available to them to seek redress of their grievance---View expressed by High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction was not open to any exception---Leave to appeal was refused. ORDER KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.---One Allah Ditta owned 643 Kanals and 14 Marlas of land situated in Village Hardosaharan of District Gujranwala. He died issueless and his entire estate was mutated in favour of his sister Mst. Taleh Bibi who in turn gifted the same to her petitioner daughter namely Mst. Rehmat Bibi. The private respondents before us questioned the said mutations of inheritance in favour of Mst. Taleh Bibi on the ground that they being the collaterals of Allah Ditta, were 'also entitled to-the said land. The suit, the appeals and revision filed by the said respondents failed but they ultimately succeeded before this Court through Civil Appeal No.294 of 1980,wherein it was held by this Court on 2-2-1991 that the entire estate of Allah Ditta deceased being inherited by his sister was not…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492