| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2001 SLG 1242 2001 SLD 1242 2001 PCRLJ 1823 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7033/B of 2000, decided on 25th April, 2001.
M. JAVED BUTTAR AND ALI NAWAZ CHOWHAN, JJ
Ch. Muhammad Javed Ghani for Petitioner. Muhammad Ameer Vilana for the State.
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7033/B of 2000, decided on 25th April, 2001.
M. JAVED BUTTAR AND ALI NAWAZ CHOWHAN, JJ
Ch. Muhammad Javed Ghani for Petitioner. Muhammad Ameer Vilana for the State.
HABIB SHIN
VS
THE STATE --Respondents
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 295-A,295-B
Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
Section: 8/9
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 497 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.295 A 295 B Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss.8/9 Ball Witnesses in their statements made under S.161, Cr.P.C. had made only allegations of general nature against the accused and did not say anything specific against him Main allegation against the accused was that he had given ‘Taaviz’ to the co accused women who were on bail Accused was not nominated in the F.I.R. and he was not seen doing anything at the alleged place of occurrence and also he did not seem to have any intention of committing an offence as covered under Ss.295 B 295 C, P.P.C. being under the influence of Hindu Culture and ignorant about his own religion ¬Case of accused called for further inquiry in circumstances and he was admitted to bail accordingly. State v. Kasnett 30 Ohio App.2d 77, 283 N.E.2d 636, 638; State v. Schlueter 127 NJL 496, 23 A.2d 249, 251; Al Quran Surat Al Falaq (CXIII); Surat Baqarah, Ayat No. 102; Surat AI Araf, Ayat Nos. 150 to 153 and Noble Quran by Dr. Muhammad Taqi ud Din Al Hilali ref. Ch. Muhammad Javed Ghani for Petitioner. Muhammad Ameer Vilana for the State. ORDER The matter relates to F.I.R. No.249, dated 3 8;2000, registered at Police Station Mananwala, District Sheikhupura, under sections 295 A, 295 B, P.P.C. and under sections 8/9 of the A.T.A., 1997. 2. The allegation was originally made against two women co accused Mst. Mukhtaran Bibi and Mst. Samina Bibi, who were allowed bail by. us on 6 11 2000. The present petitioner who was not nominated in the F.I.R., has now come for his bail as well. 3. The F.I.R. was registered at the instance of Chowkidar of a graveyard. He reported that:- 4. The bail application of the petitioner was previously rejected by the Anti Terrorist Court II, Lahore, on 24 11 2000. According to this order of the A.T.A: Court, some people have recorded statements under section 161 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner but they have levelled allegation of a general nature and have not said anything specific. The main allegation against the petitioner was that he gave Taaviz to the women co accused I already on bail.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492