| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1972 SLG 215 1972 SLD 215 1972 SCMR 327 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Review Petition No. 29 of 1971, decision dated: 6th July 1972(On review from the judgment and order of the Supreme Court, dated the 7th- July 1971, in Civil Appeal No. 25 of 1968)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., SAJJAD AHMAD AND SALAHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Review Petition No. 29 of 1971, decision dated: 6th July 1972(On review from the judgment and order of the Supreme Court, dated the 7th- July 1971, in Civil Appeal No. 25 of 1968)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., SAJJAD AHMAD AND SALAHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
GHULAM HUSSAIN AND 3 others.ers
VS
Khan MUKARAB KHAN, ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA AND 3 OTHERSÂ---Respondents
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1963), Art. 62-Review by Supreme Court-Order of remand passed by Supreme Court on appeal-Review of order sought on ground that new factual or legal position was discovered by the petitioner subsequent to passing of order of remand-Held, such discovery of new or legal position did not furnish a ground for review merely because petitioner was ignorant of same at the time. Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 6th July 1972. JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-This petition seeks review of an order of a Bench of this Court dated the 7th of July 1971, made in Civil Appeal No. 25 of 1968. By that order, the case was remanded to the Chief Settlement Commissioner to decide it afresh after hear in, both the parties on the factual and legal position with regard to the character of the disputed land for its transfer under the settlement law. This remand was considered necessary as the disputed land had been the subject of two conflicting orders by two Additional Settlement Commissioners. One had dealt with it and disposed it of in favour of the respondents, Shamshad Ali and others as an industrial concern under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act XXVIII of 1958. The other had treated it as a piece of agricultural land and transferred it under the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act XLVII of 1958 in favour of the present applicants,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492