Case Details

Citation(s)
2004 SLG 2933 2004 SLD 2933 2004 PCRLJ 1967
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 4795 of 2002, decided on 8th April, 2002.
TASSADUQ HUSSAIN, JILANI, JUSTICE, ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, JUSTICE
Munir Ahmad Bhatti for Petitioner. M. Bilal Khan, Addl. A.G. and Mrs. Yasmin Sehgal, Asstt. A.G. for the State with Zafar S.I. with Record.

MST. AZRA BIBI ER

VS

THE STATE THROUGH SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTITERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD AND ANOTHER --RespondentS

Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997

Section: 6(1)(b),2(d),21-C(4)(7)(c),14(5)

Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 6(1)(b), 2(d), 21-C(4)(7)(c) & 14(5) [as amended by Anti¬-Terrorism (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2002]---Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), S.5---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Seven accused armed with fire-arms, described in the F.I.R., overpowered gunmen at a jewellery shop in a busy street, in the broad-daylight, robbed the owner of the shop of valuable jewellery and a cash of Rs.3,50,000 and decamped from the spot--- Contentions of the petitioner was that she was a minor and she had to be tried in terms of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 which stipulated separate trial for a child and that even if the Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 had jurisdiction to try the present case it could be tried only by a Court constituted under amended S.14(5) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and since the "Court" as contemplated under S.14(5) [as amended] had not been constituted on account of the stay order granted by the High Court, Anti-Terrorism Court already functioning in terms of the un-amended Act could not try the case--¬Validity---Story as described in the F.I.R., would prima facie bring the case of the petitioner within the ambit of S.6(1)(b) & 2(d) of the Anti¬-Terrorism Act, 1997 and trial of the case by the Special Court already functioning was not exceptional to Warrant interference--Principles. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILANI:---.--- Petitioner is one of the accused in a case registered vide F.I.R. No. 230, dated 10-11-2001, under section 395, P.P.C. Police Station Kotwali, District Faisalabad. 2. Through this petition, petitioner has challenged the jurisdiction of the learned Judge Special Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which presently is seized of the trial of the afore-referred case. The grounds urged by the petitioner's learned counsel are as under:-- (i) That the petitioner is a minor and she has to be tried in terms of the. Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 which stipulates separate trial for a child. (ii) That even if the Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492