| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2010 SLG 803 2010 SLD 803 2010 PLJ 23 |
Sindh High Court
Crl. J. Appeal No. 314 of 2005, decision Dated: 13.12.2008. Date of hearing: 04.12.2008.
YASMIN ABBASE, JUSTICE
Mr. Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate for Appellant. Qazi Hafizur Rehman, Advocate for Complainant. Ms. Afsheen Aman, Advocate for State.
Crl. J. Appeal No. 314 of 2005, decision Dated: 13.12.2008. Date of hearing: 04.12.2008.
YASMIN ABBASE, JUSTICE
Mr. Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate for Appellant. Qazi Hafizur Rehman, Advocate for Complainant. Ms. Afsheen Aman, Advocate for State.
AAMIR KHAN
VS
STATE
Law:
Section:
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302--Conviction and sentence recorded against appellant by trial Court--Challenge to--Appeal against--As per complainant, some unknown persons after entering his house had murdered his nephew (deceased)--FIR registered and investigation conducted--On receiving an unknown telephone call at police station regarding involvement of appellant in murder of deceased, investigating officer called appellant at police station and he was interrogated--During interrogation appellant confessed the guilt in presence of PW--On basis of his confession he was taken in custody and case was initiated against him--It is dangerous to convict a person in heinous offence of murder on an un-reliable evidence--Implication of appellant is on basis of telephonic message received by investigating officer without any satisfactory proof--Even during investigation prosecution failed to bring any trust-worthy evidence against appellant--Prosecution has failed to prove guilt against appellant--Whole case is based on hearsay and unreliable evidence with improvement from time to time with no credibility--Appellant was acquitted from charge levelled against him--Appeal allowed. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 (10 of 1984)-- ----Art. 37--Confession before police is no confession--Art. 37 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 provides that no confession made to police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. Confession-- ----Confession of accused--Validity of--Confession of accused can be based even on a retract confession, if Court is satisfied that confession was made voluntarily--However, as a rule of caution and prudence Court looks for other evidence and material on record of case to see corroboration of retreated confession before convicting accused--Suspicion howsoever strong it may be by itself cannot take place of proof unless direct or substantive evidence is available--Conviction must be based on unimpeachable evidence and certainty of guilty--Any doubt arising in prosecution case must be resolved in favour of accused. 2000 SCMR 785, ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: YASMIN ABBASE, JUSTICE--.--- This Criminal Jail Appeal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492