| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2001 SLG 2235 2001 SLD 2235 2001 PLC 603 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petitions Nos. 1765 to 1774 of 2001 and 119’70 of 2000, heard on 18-04-2001.
MRS. FAKHAR UN NISA KHOKHAR, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Writ Petitions Nos. 1765 to 1774 of 2001 and 119’70 of 2000, heard on 18-04-2001.
MRS. FAKHAR UN NISA KHOKHAR, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MANAGING DIRECTOR, WASA, MULTAN
VS
PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 199 Constitutional petition Concurrent findings of facts by the Courts below Effect Where Courts of competent jurisdiction had given verdict in favour of respondents, such finding could not be disturbed in Constitutional petition without production of material substance available with the petitioners in support of their plea. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 199 Constitutional petition Industrial dispute Laches Past and closed transaction Dispute was with regard to regularization of service of employees which was regularized on the basis of order passed by Labour Court in the year 1994 Contention of the petitioners was that the respondents were employed on work charge basis Validity Where order, dated 31 1 1994 was assailed in the year 2001, the petition suffered from laches and the order had become past and closed transaction When the Court of competent jurisdiction had given verdict in favour of respondents, they could not be deprived from their rights High Court declined to interfere with the findings of the Courts below. 2000 SCMR 879; Muhammad Aslam v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal and others 1997 PLC 6; 1998 SCMR 1462; 1999 SCMR 2331 and PLD 1987 SC 145 ref. Mehr Muhammad Naeem Arshad for Petitioner AND Syed Asif Raza Gillani for Respondents. Date of hearing: 18th April, 2001. JUDGMENT Let these be considered as admitted cases. Vide this single judgment Writ Petitions Nos. 1766, 1967, 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772, 1773 and 1774 of 2001 are also decided. Writ Petition No. 11970 of 2000 is also on the same subject matter and is partly heard by this Court. A direction was given by this Court for its fixation in the third week of May, 2001, but since it pertains to the same matter and between the same parties, therefore, it is also decided vide this judgment. 2. The facts rising to the instant writ petitions are that the respondents being aggrieved of their employment as work charge filed a grievance petition under section 25 A of the I.R.O., 1969 before the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.9, Multan. This grievance petition was contested by the petitioners as respondents. Vide judgment,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492