Case Details

Citation(s)
2003 SLG 932 2003 SLD 932 2003 SCMR 694
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 591 of 2002, decided on 10th January, 2003. (On Appeal from the judgment/order, dated 28-3-2002 passed by Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore in Appeal No. 2615 of 2000)
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY AND SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, JJ
Hafiz S.A. Rehman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Zaidi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents

ANISUL HASSAN

VS

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through, Secretary, Local Government and another

Law:

Section: 16,proviso

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 212(3)

Law: Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975)

Section: 4(1)(a)(ii),(b)(i)

(a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974)--- ----S.16, proviso---Re-instatement in service---Arrears of pay--­Entitlement---Necessary for Court to determine, whether civil servant would be entitled to arrears of pay and, if so, to what extent: Muhammad Hafeez Javed v. Secretary Agriculture, Government of Punjab and another PLD 1992 SC 31 fol. (b) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974)--- ----S.16, proviso---Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R.4(1)(a)(ii), (b)(i)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)---Back-benefits, claim for---Compulsory retirement from service---Department partially accepted appeal, reinstated civil servant in service, but imposed penalty of stoppage of annual increments for two years and treated intervening period as extraordinary leave with pay--­Service Tribunal kept intact such penalty---Civil servant, who had retired on account of superannuation, claiming only back-benefits contended that he had 398 days leave to his credit, thus, Department should have treated period of his dismissal as leave without pay---Validity---Neither specific question had been raised before Service Tribunal nor proved that civil servant had remained idle throughout period of his dismissal---Such question could not be allowed to be argued for the first time before Supreme Court---Authority while setting aside dismissal/removal order had discretion to hold, whether civil servant was entitled to arrears of pay or not---Authority had not reinstated civil servant unconditionally--­Service Tribunal had kept intact such penalty---Civil servant had not challenged order of Tribunal to such extent---Order passed by Authority was in consonance with law---Supreme Court dismissed petition and declined leave to appeal. Muhammad Hafeez Javed v. Secretary Agriculture Government of Punjab and another PLD 1992 SC 31; Qadeer Ahmad v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lahore and another PLD 1990 SC 787; The Province of Punjab and others v. Muhammad Anwar 2001 PSC 690 and Abdul Hafeez Abbasi v. Managing Director, Pakistan International Airlines, Corporation and others 2002 SCMR 1034 rel. ORDER IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.-This petition…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492