| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2010 SLG 846 2010 SLD 846 2010 PLJ 267 |
Lahore High Court
Crl. Misc. No. 1206-B of 2009, decision & hearing Dated: 07.05.2009.
RAJA MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT KHAN ABBASI, JUSITCE
Malik Sajjad Ahmad Wains, Advocate for Petitioner. Malik M.Tariq Rajwana, Advocate for Complainant. Syed Mukhtar Masood Bukhari, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for
Respondents.
Crl. Misc. No. 1206-B of 2009, decision & hearing Dated: 07.05.2009.
RAJA MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT KHAN ABBASI, JUSITCE
Malik Sajjad Ahmad Wains, Advocate for Petitioner. Malik M.Tariq Rajwana, Advocate for Complainant. Syed Mukhtar Masood Bukhari, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
VS
STATE AND ANOTHER
Law:
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S, 489-F--Bail, grant of--Dishonored of cheque--Petitioner had admitted his liability to the extent of Rs.4,00,000, in his petition--He undertook to pay the same within two months--Section 489-F, PPC did not fall within prohibitory clause--Petitioner was in jail for the last five months and he cannot be kept in jail for an indefinite period on the whim or caprice of the prosecution--Investigation had already been completed and the accused was no more required for further investigation--Bail admitted. 2009 PCr.L.J 155, 2007 YLR 1120, 2007 MLD 926, 2008 PCr.LJ 1104, rel. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: RAJA MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT KHAN ABBASI, JUSITCE- --.--- Petitioner, namely, Muhammad Akhtar son of Ghulam Muhammad, by filing this petition seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 1072, dated 30.12.2008 under Section 489-F PPC registered with Police Station Sadar Dera Ghazi Khan. 2. Precisely the allegation against the petitioner according to the FIR registered at the instance of MuhammadBashir complainant was that he issued a cheque of Rs.13,00,0000/- in favour of the complainant which on presentation before the drawee bank was dishonoured. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that investigation has already been completed. Person of the petitioner is no more required by the police. Challan has already been submitted in the trial Court. The petitioner is behind the bar for more than 5 months. Cheque in question was given during the business transaction. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits its hability to the extent of Rs.3,30,000/- and he has paid Rs.70,000/- and he is ready to pay remaining…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492