| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2010 SLG 3260 2010 SLD 3260 2010 PLC 1449 |
Quetta High Court
Constitutional Petition No. 414 of 2008, decided on 24th May, 2010. Manzoor Ahmed Rehmani for Petitioner. Rauf Atta Standing Counsel for Respondents.
QAZI FAEZ ISA C. J. AND MUHAMMAD NOOR MESKANZAI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Constitutional Petition No. 414 of 2008, decided on 24th May, 2010. Manzoor Ahmed Rehmani for Petitioner. Rauf Atta Standing Counsel for Respondents.
QAZI FAEZ ISA C. J. AND MUHAMMAD NOOR MESKANZAI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
AIJAZ ALI
VS
SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, LABOUR AND MANPOWER DEPARTMENT, QUETTA and another
Law: Balochistan Civil Servants Act, (IX of 1974)
Section: 5
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 21
Balochistan Civil Servants Act (IX of 1974)--- ----S. 5---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.21---Constitutional petition---Appointment---Principle of locus poenitentiae---Applicability---Scope---Department advertised for the post of an office Assistant and petitioner who was serving in the department as Junior Clerk, considering himself eligible for the post of office Assistant, appeared as a candidate for said post---Committee, conducted the tests and interview, recommended two candidates for the posts---Petitioner was recommended to be kept in waiting list, subject to availability of the post of office Assistant in near future---Petitioner had contended that as he had qualified the interview, recommendation made by the Committee were binding and as post was lying vacant, he was entitled for appointment on said post---Counsel for the petitioner laid much stress on the principle of locus poenitentiae, contending that recommendation so made carried legal effect and in view of law of estoppel, authorities were bound to honour their recommendations---Validity---Petitioner did not qualify the standard for a variety of reason; firstly Committee was constituted for the limited purpose of conducting tests and interview for the post already created, available and published; Committee could not be deemed empowered to make recommendation for a post, not in existence; secondly, the recommendations so made were beyond the mandate and authority of the Committee; thirdly, the petitioner himself had declared the recommendations partly to be based on mala fide---Recommendations sought to be enforced by the petitioner, in circumstances, had no legal sanctity nor for that matter the Committee was empowered to interview a candidate in advance for the post not in existence nor published---Principle of locus poenitentiae was not available to the petitioner to maintain the petition---For attracting the principle of locus poenitentiae, the subject must be equipped with a valid right i.e. a legal order in favour of subject by a competent authority; and that should be communicated to an agency or office bound to carry it out---Said…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492