Law:

Section:

Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947)-------S. 5(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.161---Appreciation of evidence---Accused had not denied receiving of amount recovered from his possession by raiding party, but he had explained, that it was never received by him as bribe/illegal gratification, but same in fact it was recovery of public money in the form of agricultural tax due from father of the complainant---Accused to prove his version had produced two defence witnesses who were cross-examined, but credence of their testimony could not be shattered---Statements of said two defence witnesses had found strong support from the record as the list of owners of Mauza concerned pertaining to relevant years was produced by accused wherein name of father of complainant was appearing which indicated that amount of agricultural tax was outstanding against him--­Mere recovery of tainted money would not be sufficient to establish…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492