Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 2343 2001 SLD 2343 2001 CLC 362
Lahore High Court
No.673 of 1995, decision dated: 9-03-2000
MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J
M.A. Zafar for Petitioners. Tafazzal H. Rizvi for
Respondent No. 1. Khan Zahid Hussain for
Respondent No. 2

SULTANA BEGUM and others

VS

SARDAR ALI and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Prejudice-------Issuance of Permanent Transfer Deed, by Settlement Authorities ---Non-­associating the petitioner in the proceedings of issuance of the Permanent Transfer Deed---Where the petitioners remained unsuccessful up to Supreme Court after having full opportunity of hearing and the Settlement Authorities had only implemented the orders of High Court and Supreme Court, no prejudice was caused to the petitioners by Settlement Authorities while passing the orders of Permanent Transfer Deeds in compliance with the orders of the High Court and Supreme Court. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)---- ----S. 115---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5---Delay, condonation of--­Revision was barred by 31 days---Cause of delay was alleged to be serious illness of the petitioner---No proof was placed on record about the serious ailment of the petitioner which prevented her to challenge the of Lower Appellate Court within time---Effect---Where the son of the petitioner was looking after the matter and nothing was shown that the son was also prevented by a sufficient cause to file the petition within time, delay was not condoned. ORDER This dispute between the parties relates to Property No.7/19-20, situate in Mandi Baha-ud-Din. According to the facts of the case, vide order, dated 26-11-1959 the Deputy Settlement Commissioner transferred the said property in favour of Jangoo and Chota and issued P.T.O. No.23670. Bashir, Sardar and Ibrahim, tiled an appeal before the Additional Settlement Commissioner challenging the said transfer and claiming transfer of three shops in their favour being in possession thereof. The Additional Settlement Commissioner accepted the appeal of Sardar All and Ibrahim and transferred two shops to them, while the appeal of Muhammad Bashir was dismissed on 22-12-1959. Against the above, Muhammad Bashir tiled a review, which was dismissed on 25-1-1960. Jangoo, Chota and Muhammad Bashir, challenged the orders through revision petition before the Settlement Commissioner. The revision petitions filed by Jangoo and Chota were dismissed, while that of Muhammad Bashir was allowed on 19-3-1960. Against the above, Jangoo and Chota filed second…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492