| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 491 2006 SLD 491 2006 SCMR 1872 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 2499 of 2001, decided on 29th December, 2005. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 15-1-2001 of High Court of Sindh, Karachi, in F.R.A. No. 180 of 2000)
RANA BHAGWANDAS, SAIYED SAEED ASHHAD AND HAMID ALI MIRZA, JJ
K.A. Wahab, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Akhlaque Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2499 of 2001, decided on 29th December, 2005. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 15-1-2001 of High Court of Sindh, Karachi, in F.R.A. No. 180 of 2000)
RANA BHAGWANDAS, SAIYED SAEED ASHHAD AND HAMID ALI MIRZA, JJ
K.A. Wahab, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Akhlaque Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
MUHAMMAD ASIF KHAN
VS
SHEIKH ISRAR
Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)
Section: 10(3),15
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ---Ss. 10 (3) & 15---Ejectment of tenant---Wilful default in payment of monthly rent---Deposit of rent in the office of Rent Controller---Principle---Tenant had been continuously tendering rent to landlord through money order but suddenly he started depositing same in the office of, Rent Controller---Landlord filed ejectment application on the ground of default, which was allowed by Rent Controller but High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction set aside the eviction order and ejectment application was dismissed---Validity---Nothing was available on the record to show that landlord ever refused to accept rent by tender so as to entitle or give any justification to tenant to send monthly rent through money order or thereafter to change even such mode into deposit of rent in the office of Rent Controller---Deposit of rent in the office of Rent Controller by tenant in absence of any proof of refusal by the landlord, would not be a valid tender in the eyes of law---Conduct of tenant, in circumstances, would be termed to be contumacious as it would operate as an act of harassment to landlord---Rent Controller was justified in passing order of ejectment against tenant---Judgment of High Court was set aside and tenant was evicted from the premises---Appeal was allowed. Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd., Karachi v. Pirjee Muhammad Naqi 2001 SCMR 1140 and Abdul Malik v. Mrs. Qaiser Jehan 1995 SCMR 204 rel. Inayat Ullah v. Zahoor-ud-Din 1987 SCMR 1313 distinguished. JUDGMENT HAMID ALI MIRZA, J.--- This appeal with leave of this Court dated 10-12-2001 is directed against the judgment, dated 15-1-2001 in F.R.A. No.180 of 2000, passed by the learned Single Judge of High Court of Sindh Karachi, whereby the said appeal was allowed and order, dated 24-12-1999 passed by the Rent Controller was set aside. Consequently, eviction application filed by the appellant/landlord was dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant/landlord filed eviction application under section 15 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, against respondent/tenant from rented Shop No.28, Plot No.ST-5, Block 14, Federal "B" Area Karachi on…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492