Case Details

Citation(s)
2005 SLG 2193 2005 SLD 2193 (2005) 274 ITR 370
Allahabad High Court
REFERENCE No. 196 OF 1985 SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
R.K. AGARWAL AND PRAKASH KRISHNA, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Commissioner of IncomE tax*

v.

Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. (No. 2)

Law:

Section:

I. Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure - Year in which allowable - Assessment year 1978-79 - Assessee-company was engaged in business of manufacture and sale of sugar by vacuum pan process - It had claimed a sum as interest on excess levy sugar price which was disallowed by ITO on ground that it was a provision and not an ascertained liability - Allahabad High Court in assessee's case for assessment year 1974-75 had held that liability for payment of interest chargeable under Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund Act, 1976 accrued only after 1-4-1976 - Whether since assessment year in question was 1978-79, liability had accrued and it could not be said that it was only a mere provision of liability. - Held, yes II. Section 5 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Income - Accrual of - Assessment year 1978-79 - Assessee-company had advanced certain sum to 'D' Ltd., a subsidiary of assessee - Interest on said sum had been charged but in relevant previous year assessee did not charge interest considering weak financial position of 'D' Ltd. - ITO, however, made an addition of estimated interest to total income of assessee - Commissioner (Appeals) as well as Tribunal had recorded a categorical finding that it was on account of commercial expendency and continued losses suffered by 'D' Ltd. that interest was not charged in relevant year - Whether Tribunal was justified in deleting addition - Held, yes CASES REFERRED TO CIT v. Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. [2005] (2005) 274 ITR 340 / 142 Taxman 362 (All.) [Para 5] and CIT v. Radico Khaitan Ltd. [2005] (2005) 274 ITR 354 / 142 Taxman 681 (All.) [Para 6]. A.N. Mahajan for the Applicant. R.R. Agarwal for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following two questions of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as "the Act", for the opinion to this Court: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in confirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order allowing interest accrued on excess levy sugar price of Rs. 9,82,343 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492