| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2005 SLG 2562 2005 SLD 2562 2005 PTD 1821 (2005) 91 TAX 78 |
Lahore High Court
C.A. No. 418 of 2002, heard on 9th March, 2005
NASIM SIKANDAR AND, JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, JJ
A. Karim Malik for Appellant. Nemo for
Respondent
C.A. No. 418 of 2002, heard on 9th March, 2005
NASIM SIKANDAR AND, JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, JJ
A. Karim Malik for Appellant. Nemo for
Respondent
COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, FAISALABAD
VS
Messrs BILAL FIBRES LIMITED, FAISALABAD
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 2(12),2(35),2(41),3(1),7,47
JUDGMENT NASIM SIKANDAR, J.-In this departmental appeal under section 47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 an order of the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lahore, dated 16-5-2002 is assailed. 2. The assessee/respondent was found to have sold vehicles amounting to Rs.100,000 and Rs.150,000 during the years 1997-98 and 1998-99 respectively without payment of tax which, according to the Department amounted to Rs.35,600. By way of the order-in-original, dated 10-4-2001 the Deputy Collector (Adjudication) Faisalabad, after usual proceedings maintained the levy of sales tax on disposal of vehicles though the amount due as sales tax was reduced from Rs.35,600 to Rs.22,500. 3. Learned Tribunal by way of the impugned order however, disagreed. In their view the sale of vehicles not, being in course of furtherance of the business or taxable activity of the registered person, their proceeds was not liable to charge of sales tax in terms of section 3(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Accordingly the demand of Rs.22,500 as sales tax along with additional tax on the sale of vehicles was set aside. This has grieved the department. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue we will refuse to interfere with the impugned order. The issue if sale of vehicles was a "Taxable activity" under section 2(35) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 came up for hearing before a Division Bench of the Karachi High Court in re. Collector, Customs, Central Excise and Sales Tax, Karachi (West) v. Novartis Pakistan Ltd. (2002 PTD 976). Their lordships on consideration of the provisions of section 3, 7 & 47 of the Sales Tax Act as well as section 2(12)(35)(41) finally concluded that in order to construe as "business" the activity must be recurring for profit motive and in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. The disposal of fixed assets in that case in the view of their lordships could not be construed as activity for profit motive or in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture. Therefore, the same was not found to be an activity in furtherance of "business". In the view of their lordships the term "taxable activity" as defined in section 2(35) of the Act also did…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492