Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 497

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 394

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.394---Bail, refusal of---Involvement of accused in the case was fully established during investigation---Recovery of pistol, wrist watch gold ornaments including pair of ear-rings spoke heavily against accused---Accused was arrested the same day---Injury on the body of the victim was a stamp of truth of the F.I.R.---Offence committed by accused was hideous in nature---Granting bail to accused would amount to trivialize and play down the gravity of the offence committed by him---Alleged statement of the complainant lady in favour of the co-accused would in no manner be helpful to accused---Co-accused had pressurized the complainant which amounted to tampering with the prosecution evidence---In non-compoundable cases, affidavit of any prosecution witness would not carry much weight at bail stage---Accused appeared to be a criminal with considerable clouts, he was not entitled to be released on bail. ORDER S. ALI HASSAN RIZVI, J.--- Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R No.65 of 2007 under section 394, P.P.C. registered with Police Station Hanjarwal, Lahore. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 24-1-2007, the complainant lady was alone in her house and he along with his co-accused armed with dagger trespassed into the house, caused a dagger blow hitting her on the belly and looted the valuable articles by show of force. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for petitioner that one co-accused Mushtaq Ahmad having similar role has been enlarged on bail as the complainant lady had given a statement in his favour; that the recovery was planted and that no role was…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492