Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860)--Ss. 324, 337-A(i), 337-F(v), 337-L(2), 427, 148 & 149--Bail, grant of--Further Inquiry--Not nominated in FIR--Joint role of firing at victim--No specification as to whose fire hit the victim--No repetition of fire on the part of accused--Applicability of offence u/S. 324, PPC was a matter requiring further inquiry--At the most injury caused to the victim was covered by S. 337-F(v), PPC, which offence does not fall within prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.--Opinion of doctor about one of the injury having been caused with blunt weapon also makes the case against the accused one of further inquiry--Accused was behind the bars without any substantial progress in the trial--Bail was allowed. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, JUSTICE---.--- Petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case FIR No.88 dated 15.2.2010 registered with Police Station Qutabpur, Multan. 2. Briefly the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with co-accused stopped the car, where after, Shahid co-accused inflicted Rifle butt blow on the car towards driver's side and then Javed petitioner and Shahid co-accused made firing at the car, hitting Asif Abbas driver. 3. It is argued by learned counsel that petitioner has been falsely involved in the case. Further argued that two accused have been attributed fire shots without any specification as to whose fire hit the victim. The learned counsel further argued that in the medical report one injury has been shown to be result of blunt weapon, which fact negates the prosecution case. It is next contended that offence under Section 324-PPC…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492