Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 2252 2009 SLD 2252 2009 PLD 19
Islamabad High Court
W.P. Nos. 935 and 1184 of 2008, heard on 29th September, 2008, heard on: 29th September, 2008.
MUHAMMAD MUNIR PERACHA, JUSTICE AND SYED QALB-I-HASSAN, JUSTICE
Kamran Murtaza for Petitioner (in W.P.No.935 of 2008). Sadar Khurram Latif Khan Khosa for
Respondent No.8. Adul Baseer Qureshi for Petitioner (In Writ Petition No.1184 of 2008).

MAULANA ABDUL MALIK WAZIR

VS

ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY AND 13 others

Law:

Section:

(a) Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976)---.--- ---.----S.69---.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.199 & 225---.---Constitutional petition---.---Election dispute---.---High Court, jurisdiction of---.---Alternate remedy---.---Petitioner assailed election result before High Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction---.---Validity---.---Election Tribunal had the power to order re-poll on some of the polling stations of the constituency and re-counting of votes was also within its jurisdiction---.---Petitioner having alternate remedy of filing election petition, his constitutional petition was barred under Art.225 of the Constitution---.---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976)---.--- ---.----Ss.38(9), 69, 70, 103, 103-AA & Form-XIV---.---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.199 & 225---.---Constitutional petition---.---Election dispute---.---Re-polling---.---Principle---.---Absence of signatures of agents on Form-XIV---.---Effect---.---Election Commission directed re-polling in two polling stations on the ground that election result was neither prepared on prescribed Form-XIV nor the Form bore signatures of the agents of candidates---.---Validity--In absence of any allegation levelled by any candidate and finding of Election Commission that handwritten Form-XIV did not depict correct result, the Commission could not have directed re-poll---.---In absence of finding that results had been tampered with, Election Commission could not have made the same basis for re-polling on the ground that Presiding Officer did not get signatures of candidates or their agents on Form-XIV---.---Neither S.103 nor 103-AA of Representation of the People Act, 1976, could have been invoked by Election Commission to direct re-polling at two polling stations---.---Order of Election Commission suffered from misinterpretation of the provisions of Representation of the People Act, 1976, and rules framed thereunder---.---High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction declared the order of re-poll passed by Election Commission without lawful authority having no legal…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492