Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 2259 2009 SLD 2259 2009 PLD 419
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 933 of 2004, decided on 16th April, 2009. Dates of hearing: 7th, 8th and 16th April, 2009.
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CHIEF, JUSTICE, MIAN SHAKIRULLAH, JAN, JUSTICE AND RAJA FAYYAZ AHMAD, JUSTICE
Syed Iftikhar Hussian Gillani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents.

KHADIM HUSSAIN

VS

ABID RUSSIAN AND OTHERS --RespondentS

Law:

Section:

(a) Fraud---.--- ---.----Order obtained against dead person--Held, on the basis of an order, which was obtained by playing fraud with the court, against a dead person, no benefit of the same can be extended to the party, instead he deserved serious condemnation because of his such act as the litigation remained pending for a considerable period---.---Fraud is an intrinsic, collateral act, which vitiates the most solemn proceedings of courts of justice. Mehr Muhammad v. Dy Settlement Commissioner and another 1979 SCMR 182; Hafiz Brothers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Pakistan Industrial Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd. 2001 SCMR 1; Rehmat Din v Nasir Abbas 2007 SCMR 1560; Debendra Nath Dutt v. Administrator General of Bengal 35 Indian Appeals 109; Chief Settlement Commissioner v. Muhammad Fazil PLD 1975 SC 331; Ali Iqtidar Shah v. Custodian, Evacuee Property PLD 1964 Lah 274; Rehmatullah v Saleh Khan 2007 SCMR 729; Mst. Fehmida Begum v Muhammad Khalid 1992 SCMR 1908; Muhammad Younis Khan v. Government of N W P. P 1993 SCMR 618; Lal Din v. Muhammad Ibrahim 1993 SCMR 710; Muhammad Siddique v Abdul Majid 1999 SCMR 2671; Muhammad Sharif v. Sultan Humayun 2003 SCMR 1221; Hamza Haji v. State of Kerala AIR 2006 SC 302.8; S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v Jagannath AIR 1994 SC 853; Government of Sindh v. Khalil Ahmed 1994 SCMR 782; Bashir-ud-Din v. Govt. of N.-W.P.P. 1995 CLC 1394 and KERR on the Law of Fraud and Mistake ref. (b) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)---.--- ---.----S. 52---.---Transfer of property pending suit---.---Scope---.---Pending suit, property cannot be disposed of and if some one opts to do so, he shall be responsible for such deeds---.---If a transaction of sale had taken place after the institution of the suit the rights of the decree holder shall be protected. (c) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)---.--- ---.----S. 4---.---Pre-emption, right of---.---Non-deposit of sale price---.---Effect--Pre-emption right being feeble, pre-emptor is bound to follow the suit vigilantly and any slackness is always sufficient to non-suit him---.---In the present case, the amount of sale price had not been deposited in pursuance of a valid order, as such it would be deemed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492