| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 2740 2004 SLD 2740 2004 PLD 293 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. D-37 of 1996, decided on 12th August, 2003, DATE of hearing: 5th August, 2003.
MUHAMMAD ROSHAN ESSANI AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Aijaz Ali Hakro for Petitioners. Masood Noorani, Addl. A.G. Sindh for
Respondents Nos.1 to 5. Jhamat Jethanand for
Respondents Nos.6 to 8.
Constitutional Petition No. D-37 of 1996, decided on 12th August, 2003, DATE of hearing: 5th August, 2003.
MUHAMMAD ROSHAN ESSANI AND AMIR HANI MUSLIM, JJ
Aijaz Ali Hakro for Petitioners. Masood Noorani, Addl. A.G. Sindh for
Respondents Nos.1 to 5. Jhamat Jethanand for
Respondents Nos.6 to 8.
GUL MUHAMMAD and anothers
VS
GOVERNMENT OF Sindh court through Secretary, Revenue, Government of Sindh court, Hyderabad and 7 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115)----- ----Paras 28 & 29---West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 (M.L.R. 64), para. 19---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Constitutional petition---Agreement to sell resumed land on payment of instalments under Para. 19 of M.L.R. 64---Petitioner as grantee of such land after repeal of M.L.R.. 64 claimed to be owner thereof since instalments had been waived by Para. 28 of M. L. R. 115---Authority, after holding inquiry, cancelled grant on the ground that petitioner was not in physical cultivating possession of land and its use as houses was impermissible---Validity---Petitioner had participated in inquiry and had not disputed inquiry report, which was made basis of impugned order--Promulgation of M.L.R. 115 had not nullified effect of such sale agreement or conditions incorporated therein---Provision of M.L.R. 115 had .only relaxed and/or waived condition of payment of instalments, while remaining other conditions of agreement intact---Promulgation of M.L.R. 115 could not change status of land, which was in the nature of grant---Question of possession being a question of fact, could not be decided in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction---Petitioner had not availed remedy of revision---High Court would not sit in appeal against impugned orders by allowing petitioner to bypass available statutory remedy---Jurisdiction exercised by authority was covered by law---High Court dismissed Constitutional petition. Ghulam Muhammad v. Sijawal Hussian 1990 MLD 2412 ref. Khushi Muhammad v. Chief Land Commissioner 1993 SCMR 878 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)----- ----Art. 199---Issue raised being in nature of factual controversy--Effect-High Court would not entertain such controversy in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction. JUDGMENT AMIR HANI MUSLIM, J.---Through this petition, the petitioners have challenged orders of Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh, Hyderabad and Land Commission, Hyderabad, respondents Nos. 2 and 3 respectively, passed by them on the proceedings initiated by the petitioners. 2. The facts as pleaded in the memo. of, petition are that an area admeasuring 15.35 Acres was granted…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492