Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 3367 2006 SLD 3367 (2006) 280 ITR 612
Allahabad High Court
IT REFERENCE No. 41 OF 1985 SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
R.K. AGRAWAL AND K.N. OJHA, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Chandpur Sugar Co. Ltd.

v.

Commissioner of IncomE tax

Law:

Section:

Section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Income from other sources - Chargeable as - Assessment year 1978-79 - During accounting year under consideration, assessee, who was in process of setting-up sugar mill, had borrowed funds from financial institutions and banks on which it had paid interest - A part of funds so received was deposited in short-term deposits with banks on which assessee had earned interest - Assessee claimed that interest receipts should be set off against interest payments and, therefore, no interest income was assessable in its hands - Assessing Officer rejecting claim of assessee held that interest earned by assessee was assessable under head 'Income from other sources' - Whether in view of decision in case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT [1997] 227 ITR 172/ 93 Taxman 502 , interest earned by assessee had rightly been held to be its income and taxable under head 'Income from other sources' - Held, yes CASES REFERRED TO India Cements Ltd. v. CIT [1966] 60 ITR 52 (SC) [Para 5], Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT [1975] 98 ITR 167 (SC) [Para 5], Addl. CITv. Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [1983] 141 ITR 134 /[1982] 9 Taxman 95 (Delhi) [Para 5], CIT v. Paramount Premises (P.) Ltd. [1991] 190 ITR 259 (Bom.) [Para 5], CIT v. Tirupati Woollen Mills Ltd. [1992] 193 ITR 252 (Cal.) [Para 5], CIT v. New Central Jute Mills Co. Ltd. [1979] 118 ITR 1005 /2 Taxman 246 (Cal.) [Para 6], Addl. CIT v. Madras Fertilisers Ltd. [1980] 122 ITR 139(Mad.) [Para 6], CED v. Smt. Kalawati Devi [1980] 125 ITR 762 /4 Taxman 250 (All.) [Para 6], Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT [1997] 227 ITR 172/ 93 Taxman 502 (SC) [Para 6], CIT v. Coromandal Cements Ltd. [1998] 234 ITR 412 (SC) [Para 6], and CIT v. Bokaro Steel Ltd. [1999] 236 ITR 315 (SC) [Para 8], CIT v. Autokast Ltd. [2001] 248 ITR 110 / 102 Taxman 94 (SC) [Para 8]. Vikram Gulati for the Applicant. A.N. Mahajan for the Respondent. JUDGMENT R.K. Agrawal, J. - The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act, for opinion to this Court.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492