| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 154 2008 SLD 154 2008 PTD 1099 |
Federal Tax Ombudsman
Complaint No.756 of 2003, decision dated: 13-12-2003
, JUSTICE (RETD.) SALEEM AKHTAR, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Muhammad Anwar, Consultant (Dealing Officer). None present for the Complainant. Tahir S. Bhatti, ACIT for
Respondent
Complaint No.756 of 2003, decision dated: 13-12-2003
, JUSTICE (RETD.) SALEEM AKHTAR, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Muhammad Anwar, Consultant (Dealing Officer). None present for the Complainant. Tahir S. Bhatti, ACIT for
Respondent
Messrs NEW BISMILLAH AUTOS, FAISALABAD
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 56,61
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000
Section: 9,11
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 122A
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss. 56 & 61---Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), S.122-A---Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Ss.9 & 11---Notice to furnish return of total income for 3 years---Assessee's plea that no business was conducted during years 1999-2000 and. 2000-2002 was accepted by Assessing Officer, who gave him income tax challan of Rs.550 for year 2001-2002, which he deposited on next date---Assessing Officer thereafter issued consolidated ex parte assessment order of all 3 years for non-compliance of such notice---Validity---Revenue had not denied factum of appearance of assessee before Assessing Officer and handing over him such challan bearing his tax number, stamp and initials of concerned official---Assessee had furnished certificate from Bank regarding his employment as Guard till 3-6-2000 and rent agreement about hiring business premises, but same were not available on record---Assessing Officer in order to support assessed income had not conducted enquiry regarding date of commencement and extent of assessee's business---By issuing challan for 2001-2002, impression had been given that no demand had been created for years 1999-2000 and 2001-2002---Revenue could not explain, why after issuing such challan, assessment creating a demand for 3 years had been made---Entire proceedings by Assessing Officer lacked bona fides and amounted to fraud on statute and assessee as well---Impugned assessment was arbitrary, baseless, abuse of power and violative of principles of natural justice---Maladministration was proved---Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended to Revenue to cancel impugned assessment under S.122-A of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and frame fresh assessment after conducting enquiry and hearing assessee. (b) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss. 56 & 61---Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.2(3)---Framing of ex parte assessment order---Good faith of Assessing Officer---Proof---Not necessary to probe motive of Assessing Officer, where maladministration was proved---Burden would lay on Assessing Officer .to prove his bona fides.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492