"\u003chtml xmlns:o=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office\"\r\nxmlns:w=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word\"\r\nxmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40\"\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003chead\u003e\r\n\u003cmeta http-equiv=Content-Type content=\"text/html; charset=windows-1252\"\u003e\r\n\u003cmeta name=ProgId content=Word.Document\u003e\r\n\u003cmeta name=Generator content=\"Microsoft Word 11\"\u003e\r\n\u003cmeta name=Originator content=\"Microsoft Word 11\"\u003e\r\n\u003clink rel=File-List href=\"2024J15_files/filelist.xml\"\u003e\r\n\u003ctitle\u003eGENDER-BASED VIOLENCE IN PAKISTAN: \u003c/title\u003e\r\n\u003c!--[if gte mso 9]\u003e\u003cxml\u003e\r\n \u003co:DocumentProperties\u003e\r\n \u003co:Author\u003eUser\u003c/o:Author\u003e\r\n \u003co:Template\u003eNormal\u003c/o:Template\u003e\r\n \u003co:LastAuthor\u003eUser\u003c/o:LastAuthor\u003e\r\n \u003co:Revision\u003e2\u003c/o:Revision\u003e\r\n \u003co:TotalTime\u003e0\u003c/o:TotalTime\u003e\r\n \u003co:Created\u003e2025-02-17T15:26:00Z\u003c/o:Created\u003e\r\n \u003co:LastSaved\u003e2025-02-17T15:26:00Z\u003c/o:LastSaved\u003e\r\n \u003co:Pages\u003e1\u003c/o:Pages\u003e\r\n \u003co:Words\u003e6574\u003c/o:Words\u003e\r\n \u003co:Characters\u003e37472\u003c/o:Characters\u003e\r\n \u003co:Company\u003eHOME\u003c/o:Company\u003e\r\n \u003co:Lines\u003e312\u003c/o:Lines\u003e\r\n \u003co:Paragraphs\u003e87\u003c/o:Paragraphs\u003e\r\n \u003co:CharactersWithSpaces\u003e43959\u003c/o:CharactersWithSpaces\u003e\r\n \u003co:Version\u003e11.5606\u003c/o:Version\u003e\r\n \u003c/o:DocumentProperties\u003e\r\n\u003c/xml\u003e\u003c![endif]--\u003e\u003c!--[if gte mso 9]\u003e\u003cxml\u003e\r\n \u003cw:WordDocument\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DoNotHyphenateCaps/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:PunctuationKerning/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing\u003e6 pt\u003c/w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing\u003e6 pt\u003c/w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery\u003e0\u003c/w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery\u003e3\u003c/w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery\u003e\r\n \u003cw:UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:ValidateAgainstSchemas\u003efalse\u003c/w:ValidateAgainstSchemas\u003e\r\n \u003cw:SaveIfXMLInvalid\u003efalse\u003c/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid\u003e\r\n \u003cw:IgnoreMixedContent\u003efalse\u003c/w:IgnoreMixedContent\u003e\r\n \u003cw:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText\u003efalse\u003c/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DoNotUnderlineInvalidXML/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:DoNotShadeFormData/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:Compatibility\u003e\r\n \u003cw:FootnoteLayoutLikeWW8/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:ShapeLayoutLikeWW8/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:AlignTablesRowByRow/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:ForgetLastTabAlignment/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:LayoutRawTableWidth/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:LayoutTableRowsApart/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:UseWord97LineBreakingRules/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:SelectEntireFieldWithStartOrEnd/\u003e\r\n \u003cw:UseWord2002TableStyleRules/\u003e\r\n \u003c/w:Compatibility\u003e\r\n \u003cw:BrowserLevel\u003eMicrosoftInternetExplorer4\u003c/w:BrowserLevel\u003e\r\n \u003c/w:WordDocument\u003e\r\n\u003c/xml\u003e\u003c![endif]--\u003e\u003c!--[if gte mso 9]\u003e\u003cxml\u003e\r\n \u003cw:LatentStyles DefLockedState=\"false\" LatentStyleCount=\"156\"\u003e\r\n \u003c/w:LatentStyles\u003e\r\n\u003c/xml\u003e\u003c![endif]--\u003e\r\n\u003cstyle\u003e\r\n\u003c!--\r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal\r\n\t{mso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmargin:0in;\r\n\tmargin-bottom:.0001pt;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:12.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-fareast-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";}\r\n /* Page Definitions */\r\n @page\r\n\t{mso-page-border-surround-header:no;\r\n\tmso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}\r\n@page Section1\r\n\t{size:8.5in 11.0in;\r\n\tmargin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;\r\n\tmso-header-margin:.5in;\r\n\tmso-footer-margin:.5in;\r\n\tmso-paper-source:0;}\r\ndiv.Section1\r\n\t{page:Section1;}\r\n--\u003e\r\n\u003c/style\u003e\r\n\u003c!--[if gte mso 10]\u003e\r\n\u003cstyle\u003e\r\n /* Style Definitions */\r\n table.MsoNormalTable\r\n\t{mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\";\r\n\tmso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-tstyle-colband-size:0;\r\n\tmso-style-noshow:yes;\r\n\tmso-style-parent:\"\";\r\n\tmso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;\r\n\tmso-para-margin:0in;\r\n\tmso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;\r\n\tmso-pagination:widow-orphan;\r\n\tfont-size:10.0pt;\r\n\tfont-family:\"Times New Roman\";\r\n\tmso-ansi-language:#0400;\r\n\tmso-fareast-language:#0400;\r\n\tmso-bidi-language:#0400;}\r\n\u003c/style\u003e\r\n\u003c![endif]--\u003e\r\n\u003c/head\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cbody lang=EN-US style=\u0027tab-interval:.5in;text-justify-trim:punctuation\u0027\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cdiv class=Section1\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eGENDER-BASED VIOLENCE\r\nIN PAKISTAN: \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eLEGAL FRAMEWORK,\r\nJUDICIAL PERSPECTIVES, \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:5.0pt;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eAND CALL FOR\r\nCOMPREHENSIVE ACTION.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eBy \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eAbdul Shakoor\r\nKalhoro,\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal align=center style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:center;\r\nmso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eAdditional Sessions\r\nJudge Mirpur Mathelo\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:9.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eUnited Nation\u0027s High Commission for\r\nRefugees (UNHCR) defines gender-based violence in these words, \u0026quot;harmful\r\nacts directed at an individual based on their gender. It is rooted in gender\r\ninequality, the abuse of power and harmful norms\u0026quot;. According to the UNHCR,\r\nthe term \u0026quot;sexual and gender-based violence\u0026quot; also distinguishes\r\nindividuals based on their gender from other types of violence. It includes\r\nviolent acts such as honor killings, rape, physical and mental torture,\r\nmutilation, sexual slavery, forced impregnation, and murder.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:9.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-spacerun:yes\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eGender-based violence refers to any harmful\r\nact that is perpetrated against an individual based on their gender, often\r\ntargeting women and girls due to entrenched patriarchal norms and\r\ndiscriminatory attitudes. This violence can take various forms, including domestic\r\nviolence, sexual harassment, honor killings, acid attacks, forced marriages,\r\nand dowry-related violence. It is rooted in unequal power dynamics and social\r\nstructures that perpetuate the subjugation of women and girls, leading to\r\nserious physical, psychological, and socio-economic consequences. Gender-based\r\nviolence is a pervasive issue in Pakistan, affecting individuals across diverse\r\nsocio-economic backgrounds and geographical locations.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:9.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eGender-based violence is a pervasive and\r\ndeeply ingrained issue that affects women and girls across the country. It\r\ntakes various forms, including domestic violence, sexual harassment, honor\r\nkillings, forced marriages, acid attacks, and dowry-related violence. This\r\nviolence is rooted in patriarchal norms, discriminatory attitudes, and unequal\r\npower dynamics that perpetuate the subjugation of women and girls. The issue of\r\ngender-based violence has been addressed by the the high courts in various\r\ncases; for instance, in the case of \u0026quot;PLD 2002 Lahore 444, Muhammad Siddique\r\nv. The State. The Court discussed the historical context of violence against\r\nwomen and the efforts made by Islam to curb such practices, including the\r\npre-Islamic Arab practice of burying daughters alive, which was strongly\r\ncondemned in the Holy Quran. The Court also acknowledged the ongoing incidents\r\nof violence against women despite the Qura\u0027nic commandments and the penal law\r\nof the land.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eAkram Khan v. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\r\n(PLD 2001 SC 96) when the Supreme Court of Pakistan first time see the issue of\r\nso called \u0026quot;honour killings\u0026quot; in a different way. \u0026quot;The Court said\r\nthat no one had the right nor should they be allow to take law into their own\r\nhands to take the life of anybody in the name of \u003ci\u003eghairat\u003c/i\u003e (family\r\nhonour)\u0026quot; (Ibid) The Court also held that law and religion did not permit\r\nthe \u0026quot;honour killings\u0026quot; and that under the Article 8(1) of\r\nConstitution. \u0026quot;Any law, or any custom or usage having the force of law, in\r\nso far as it is inconsistent with the rights conferred by this Chapter, shall,\r\nto the extent of such inconsistency, be void.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003ePLD 2023 Lahore 171 \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eGulsher v.\r\nAdditional Sessions Judge\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-spacerun:yes\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eBhowana\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e,\r\nwherein the Honorable Lahore High Court observed that;\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eGender Based Violence impairs women\u0027s and\r\ngirls\u0027 fundamental rights particularly their right to and life and dignity. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe consequences of gender-based violence\r\nare devastating, not only for the immediate victims but also for families,\r\ncommunities, and society as a whole. It undermines the health, dignity, and\r\nrights of women and girls, perpetuates cycles of poverty and inequality, and\r\nhampers social and economic development.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eAddressing gender-based violence requires\r\na multi-faceted approach that involves legal reforms, enforcement of existing\r\nlaws, awareness-raising campaigns, access to justice and support services for\r\nsurvivors, empowerment of women and girls, and challenging harmful gender norms\r\nand stereotypes. It also requires the commitment and collaboration of\r\ngovernment institutions, civil society, religious leaders, and the broader\r\ncommunity to create a culture of respect, equality, and non-violence. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003ePakistan has taking a significant step in\r\naddressing violence against women by establishing over 1,000 courts dedicated\r\nto tackling such issues. Former Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa announced the\r\ninitiative, aiming to provide a safe space for victims to speak out without\r\nfear of retaliation in a conservative society where domestic violence is often\r\ntaboo. These courts were to be operated separately from existing ones and hold\r\nhearings specifically for domestic violence cases, allowing victims to testify\r\nin confidence. The move follows reports of thousands of cases of violence\r\nagainst women annually in Pakistan, including rape, acid attacks, sexual\r\nassault, kidnappings, and honor killings. Human rights campaigners and women\u0027s\r\nrights activists had welcomed the initiative, highlighting its potential to\r\nencourage victims to come forward and seek justice.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eNavigating Gender\r\nBias in Judicial Responses to Gender-Based Violence.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn the context of Pakistan, judges\u0027\r\nunderstanding of the sensitivity of gender-based violence (GBV) is crucial for\r\neffective adjudication and justice delivery. However, male bias or prejudice\r\namong judges can often complicate the handling of such cases for several\r\nreasons: \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eSocietal Norms and Gender Stereotypes\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nPakistan, like many other societies, has deeply ingrained patriarchal norms and\r\ngender stereotypes. These norms often influence judges\u0027 perceptions and\r\nattitudes towards cases of GBV. Male judges, influenced by societal\r\nexpectations, may have preconceived notions about the roles and behaviors of\r\nwomen and men, which can affect their decision-making process. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eLack of Understanding of Gender\r\nDynamics\u003c/b\u003e: Male judges may lack a nuanced understanding of the complex\r\ndynamics underlying GBV, including power imbalances, systemic inequalities, and\r\nsocial norms that perpetuate violence against women. Without this\r\nunderstanding, judges may inadvertently minimize the severity of GBV or fail to\r\nrecognize subtle forms of abuse. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eEmpathy Gap\u003c/b\u003e: Male judges may\r\nstruggle to empathize fully with female victims of GBV due to differences in\r\nlife experiences and perspectives. This empathy gap can manifest in judgments\r\nthat seem insensitive or dismissive of survivors\u0027 experiences, leading to further\r\ntrauma and distress for the victims. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eLegal Interpretation and Application\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nMale judges may interpret and apply laws related to GBV through a lens that\r\nreflects traditional gender roles and biases. This can result in decisions that\r\nprioritize preserving societal norms over protecting the rights and well-being\r\nof victims.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eChallenges in Providing Fair Treatment\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nMale judges may face challenges in providing fair treatment to female survivors\r\nin the courtroom, particularly when dealing with sensitive issues such as rape\r\nor domestic violence. This can stem from discomfort or lack of training in\r\nhandling such cases with sensitivity and respect. Addressing these challenges\r\nrequires targeted efforts to raise awareness among judges about the realities\r\nof GBV, promote gender sensitivity training, and foster a culture of empathy\r\nand respect for survivors within the judicial system. Additionally, increasing\r\nthe representation of female judges in courts can help mitigate male bias and\r\nensure diverse perspectives in decision-making processes related to GBV cases.\r\nOverall, addressing male bias and prejudice among judges is essential for\r\nensuring equitable access to justice for survivors of GBV in Pakistan. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eAddressing\r\nGender-Based Violence: The Role of the Judiciary and Specialized Courts (GBV)\r\nin Pakistan\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe judiciary in our country plays a\r\ncrucial role in interpreting and applying the law, adjudicating disputes, and\r\nenforcing fundamental rights, which includes addressing issues of gender-based\r\nviolence. The Constitution of Pakistan, through Article 25, guarantees equal\r\nprotection of the law to all citizens irrespective of sex, which forms the\r\nbasis for legal action against gender-based violence. However, despite these\r\nconstitutional guarantees, the practical enforcement and protection of these\r\nrights can be challenging, as evidenced by reports of violence against\r\nminorities and gender-based violence.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Punjab Gender Parity Report 2022\r\nreveals a disturbing trend of gender-based violence against women in Pakistan, with\r\n34,854 reported cases in Punjab alone, including kidnappings and murders. The\r\ndecrease in reported cases is attributed to underreporting rather than a\r\ngenuine decline. Rooted in inadequate law enforcement and a patriarchal\r\nculture, victims often face blame instead of perpetrators. Conviction rates are\r\nabysmally low, with only 4% resulting in convictions. The report underscores\r\nthe urgent need for authorities to implement laws, provide support, and ensure\r\nsafety for victims of violence and abuse.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe establishment of gender-based\r\nviolence courts in Pakistan is a significant step towards addressing the\r\npressing issue of gender-based violence, with the aim of prioritizing such\r\ncases and handling them with gender sensitivity. These courts are designed to cater\r\nto the victims of gender-based violence, which includes women, children, and\r\nother vulnerable segments of society, with a particular focus on the\r\nexperiences of women and transgender individuals.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eDespite the legislative measures and the\r\ncreation of these specialized courts, the reduction of gender-based violence\r\nhas been hindered by various systemic issues. These include a slow judicial\r\nprocess, procedural lethargy, an inefficient approach system, which\r\ncollectively contribute to the delay in the delivery of justice.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe judiciary\u0027s role is not only to\r\ninterpret and apply the law but also to ensure that justice is delivered\r\nefficiently and fairly. The Constitution of Pakistan, through Article 25,\r\nguarantees equal protection of the law and prohibits discrimination on the\r\nbasis of sex, while also allowing for affirmative action to protect women and\r\nchildren. Furthermore, the judiciary is recognized as an independent entity\r\nresponsible for upholding fundamental rights and ensuring the rule of law.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eWhile the establishment of gender-based\r\nviolence courts is a positive development, the Pakistani judiciary faces\r\nchallenges in reducing gender-based violence effectively. Addressing procedural\r\ndelays, ensuring the integrity of the judicial process, and promoting gender\r\nsensitivity within the judiciary are critical steps towards achieving the goal\r\nof speedy and fair justice for victims of gender-based violence .\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe National Judicial Policy Making\r\nCommittee\u0027s (NJPMC) directive in October 2019 to establish separate courts for\r\ngender-based violence cases is a step towards specialized adjudication in this\r\narea, which could potentially address some of the systemic issues in dealing\r\nwith such cases. However, the effectiveness of these courts and the broader\r\nlegal framework in curbing gender-based violence would depend on several\r\nfactors, including the implementation of laws, the sensitivity and training of\r\nthe judiciary, and the overall societal attitudes towards gender and\r\nminorities. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe existing legal framework in Pakistan\r\nhas been criticized for its inadequacies in protecting against gender-based\r\nviolence, with societal norms and prejudices often influencing the outcomes of\r\nsuch cases. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan Report, 2013, highlights\r\nthe grim reality of sectarian and gender-based violence, indicating that\r\nconstitutional text alone is insufficient to protect minorities and vulnerable\r\ngroups from violence. This suggests that there are significant gaps between the\r\nconstitutional guarantees and their practical realization.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn summary, while the Pakistani judiciary\r\nhas a constitutional mandate to uphold the rights of all citizens and address\r\ngender-based violence, there are notable challenges in the existing system of\r\nadjudication and legislation. These challenges include societal intolerance,\r\nthe prevalence of hate speech, and violence against women and transgender\r\nindividuals, which require serious policy reforms and proactive measures by the\r\nstate and judiciary to ensure that the rights guaranteed by the Constitution\r\nare honored in practice.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eCourts\u0027 approaches toward gender-based\r\nviolence in Pakistan have evolved over time but continue to face challenges in\r\neffectively addressing this pervasive issue. Judicial effectiveness in delivery\r\nof justice for victims of violence is an integral part of the State\u0027s\r\ncommitment to eliminating violence against women.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Islamabad High Court condemned\r\ncultural norms that not only tolerate but endorse violence against women (Imran\r\nJaved Aziz v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior,\r\nWrit Petition No. 753/2020, per Athar Minallah CJ)\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u0026quot;In defiance of the explicit\r\ncommands of Islam, child marriage, rape and honour killings are not uncommon in\r\nour society today. Women are forced into marriage against their will. Heinous\r\ntraditions of Karokari, Swara, Wani and other forms of exploitation are being\r\npracticed in a State where 97% of the population professes to be Muslim. The\r\ntribal and other societal norms seem to have taken precedence over the Islamic\r\ninjunctions. Female children are not safe and there cannot be a more offensive\r\nillustration than the unimaginable pain and agony suffered by the little\r\ninnocent \u0026quot;Zainab.\u0026quot; The alarming aspect is that there is no outrage\r\nagainst the practices and mindsets which are a blatant violation of the\r\nunambiguous injunctions of Islam. The practices and attitudes highlighted above\r\nare prevalent in our society and are public knowledge. Evidence of these\r\npractices are the female victims whose heartrending stories are heard by the\r\nCourts across the country on a daily basis. These norms are not only offensive\r\nbut blasphemous\u0026quot;\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eHere are some key aspects of courts\u0027\r\napproaches:\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.1in;\r\nmargin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.3in;mso-pagination:none;\r\npage-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:\r\nnone\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e1.\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eLegal\r\nFramework\u003c/b\u003e: Pakistan has enacted various laws aimed at addressing\r\ngender-based violence, including the Protection of Women (Criminal Laws\r\nAmendment) Act, the Acid Control and Acid Crime Prevention Act, and the\r\nDomestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act. Courts play a crucial role\r\nin interpreting and applying these laws to ensure justice for survivors.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.1in;\r\nmargin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.3in;mso-pagination:none;\r\npage-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:\r\nnone\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e2.\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eLegal\r\nRemedies: Courts provide legal remedies for survivors of gender-based violence,\r\nincluding protection orders, restraining orders, and compensation. They\r\nadjudicate cases involving domestic violence, sexual assault, honor killings,\r\nand other forms of violence against women and girls.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.1in;\r\nmargin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.3in;mso-pagination:none;\r\npage-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:\r\nnone\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e3.\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eSensitization\r\nand Training: Efforts have been made to sensitize judges, lawyers, and court\r\npersonnel to the gender dimensions of violence and discrimination. Training\r\nprograms aim to enhance understanding of gender-based violence dynamics,\r\nsurvivor-centered approaches, and gender-sensitive legal procedures.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:.1in;\r\nmargin-left:.5in;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.3in;mso-pagination:none;\r\npage-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:\r\nnone\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e4.\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eProsecution\r\nand Accountability: Courts play a pivotal role in prosecuting perpetrators of\r\ngender-based violence and holding them accountable for their actions. However,\r\nchallenges such as weak law enforcement, corruption, and societal pressure\r\noften impede effective prosecution and conviction rates.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eAddressing Coercion\r\nin Domestic Violence Settlements,\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe coercion of female, victims by male\r\nfamily members to settle domestic violence cases with the accused persons is a\r\nconcerning issue in Pakistan. This practice often stems from various factors,\r\nincluding cultural norms, societal pressures, economic dependency, and fear of\r\nretaliation. For a crime committed by a male member of the family, particularly\r\nsex or affair outside the marriage, the village council (an assembly of\r\nlandlords, local leaders, or influential persons to settle the issue without\r\ninvolving courts) often punishes the culprits by giving either a young sister\r\nor daughter in a marriage to the victim\u0027s family as compensation. Although it\r\nis illegal in Pakistan, the culture is still followed in villages or\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-spacerun:yes\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eremote tribal areas. In this situation, it is\r\nalways a female member of the family that suffers without any fault or for the\r\ncrime of a male member. Though underCriminal Law (Third Amendment) Act, 2011\r\nsection 310-A, P.P.C., has been introduced which has criminalized such Act, but\r\ndespite legal prohibitions, the persistence of such practices underscores the\r\nneed for continued efforts to ensure the effective implementation of laws and\r\nto address the underlying social and cultural factors that perpetuate harmful\r\npractices against women and girl.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eHere are some key points to consider\r\nregarding this issue:\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003ePatriarchal Norms\u003c/b\u003e: Pakistan, like\r\nmany societies, has deeply ingrained patriarchal norms that prioritize male\r\nauthority and control within families. In such contexts, female victims of\r\ndomestic violence may face pressure from male family members to maintain family\r\nhonor or avoid tarnishing the family\u0027s reputation by pursuing legal action\r\nagainst the accused. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eUnfortunately, victims of sexual abuse or\r\ngender-based violence are often viewed with suspicion, and criminal complaints\r\nare rarely seriously investigated by Police. Much of the society lives under a\r\nso-called \u0026quot;honour\u0026quot; code, where women who bring \u0026quot;shame\u0026quot; on\r\ntheir families can be subjected to violence or murder.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eEconomic Dependency\u003c/b\u003e: In many\r\ncases, female victims may be economically dependent on their male family\r\nmembers, making them vulnerable to coercion and manipulation. The fear of\r\nlosing financial support or being ostracized from the family may compel them to\r\nagree to settlements against their wishes. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eFear of Retaliation\u003c/b\u003e: Victims of\r\ndomestic violence often fear further abuse or retaliation from the accused or\r\ntheir associates if they pursue legal action. This fear may be heightened if\r\nthe accused persons are influential or well-connected within the community or\r\nif the legal system is perceived as ineffective in providing protection.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eLack of Legal Awareness and Support\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nMany female victims of domestic violence in Pakistan may have limited knowledge\r\nabout their legal rights or access to support services. They may face barriers\r\nsuch as lack of legal aid, social stigma, or inadequate protection mechanisms,\r\nwhich can make it challenging for them to seek justice through formal channels.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eSensitization of Investigation\r\nOfficers Handling Gender-Based Violence Cases.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eSensitizing investigation officers who\r\nhandle cases of gender-based violence in Pakistan is crucial for improving the\r\nquality of investigations, ensuring survivor-centered approaches, and enhancing\r\naccountability. Furthermore, any inappropriate conduct exhibited by the police\r\ncan create or increase the risk of violence to the victim. Here are some key\r\naspects of sensitization efforts:\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e1.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eGender Sensitivity Training\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nProviding comprehensive training programs to investigation officers on gender\r\nsensitivity, human rights, and the dynamics of gender-based violence. These\r\nprograms should cover topics such as understanding the impact of gender norms\r\nand stereotypes, recognizing different forms of violence, and communicating\r\neffectively with survivors.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e2.\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eSurvivor-Centered Approaches\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nEmphasizing survivor-centered approaches in investigations, which prioritize\r\nthe safety, dignity, and autonomy of survivors. Training should focus on\r\ntechniques for conducting trauma-informed interviews, supporting survivors\r\nthrough the legal process, and minimizing re-traumatization.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e3.\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eLegal Framework\u003c/b\u003e: Ensuring investigation\r\nofficers have a thorough understanding of relevant laws and regulations related\r\nto gender-based violence, including the Protection of Women (Criminal Laws\r\nAmendment) Act, the Acid Control and Acid Crime Prevention Act, and the\r\nDomestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act. Training should cover\r\nprocedures for evidence collection, documentation, and filing of charges.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e4.\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eSensitivity to Marginalized Groups\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nSensitizing investigation officers to the specific needs and vulnerabilities of\r\nmarginalized groups, including women from rural areas, ethnic minorities,\r\nreligious minorities. Training should address intersectional forms of\r\ndiscrimination and ensure inclusive and non-discriminatory approaches to\r\ninvestigations. For example the issue of forced conversion, particularly of\r\nHindu girls in Pakistan, is a complex and sensitive matter that has legal,\r\nsocial, and human rights dimensions. It is important to note that forced\r\nconversion is a violation of human rights and is contrary to the principles of\r\nfreedom of religion and belief. The Pakistani legal system, based on the\r\nprinciples enshrined in its Constitution and international commitments, is\r\nexpected to protect the rights of all individuals, including religious\r\nminorities, and to provide remedies against coercion and discrimination. This\r\nmatter involves religious, cultural, and human rights considerations, and any\r\nmishandling or oversight can exacerbate tensions and injustices. Investigations\r\ninto forced conversion cases must prioritize the protection of the rights and\r\nwell-being of the individuals involved, ensuring their safety and security\r\nthroughout the process.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e5.\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eAddressing Bias and Stereotypes\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nChallenging biases and stereotypes that may influence investigation officers\u0027\r\nperceptions and responses to gender-based violence. Training should promote\r\nawareness of common myths and misconceptions surrounding gender roles,\r\nsexuality, and victim-blaming attitudes;\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-spacerun:yes\u0027\u003e \r\n\u003c/span\u003euntil land mark Judgment of Lahore High Court, reported as the \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eSadaf\r\nAziz v. Federation of Pakistan and others\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e 2021 PCr.LJ 205 outlawing the\r\npractice of subjecting female rape survivors to virginity tests. The court\r\ndeclared the practice as having no legal basis and stated that it violates the\r\npersonal dignity of the victim. Justice Ayesha Malik, delivering the judgment,\r\ndescribed virginity testing as highly invasive and humiliating, emphasizing\r\nthat it is used to cast suspicion on the victim rather than focusing on the\r\naccused and the act of sexual violence. The ruling is significant in challenging\r\nthe patriarchal structures that perpetuate victim blaming and will help\r\ndismantle barriers preventing women from reporting cases of rape. This decision\r\nis a culmination of activism and efforts by the feminist movement in Pakistan.\r\nTFT is based on the unscientific and misogynist assumption that a woman who\r\nengages in sexual intercourse is less likely to have been raped hence she lacks\r\nthe moral authority to make an accusation of rape or sexual violence.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe World Health Organization (WHO) has\r\ncondemned the practice, stating that it has no scientific validity and can\r\ncause physical and psychological harm.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Honorable Supreme Court in \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eAtif\r\nZareef v. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e PLD 2021 550, observed held that recording the\r\nsexual history of the survivor by carrying out the TFT and questioning the\r\nsurvivor on her sexual history or character in order to discredit her\r\ncredibility is unconstitutional and illegal.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e6.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eCollaboration and Coordination\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nEncouraging collaboration and coordination between investigation officers, prosecutors,\r\nsocial workers, healthcare professionals, and civil society organizations.\r\nTraining should highlight the importance of multi-disciplinary approaches to\r\naddressing gender-based violence and promoting holistic support for survivors.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e7.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eMonitoring and Evaluation\u003c/b\u003e:\r\nEstablishing mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of\r\nsensitization efforts, including feedback mechanisms from survivors,\r\nstakeholders, and community members. Training programs should be regularly\r\nreviewed and updated based on lessons learned and emerging best practices.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eOverall, sensitizing investigation\r\nofficers is a critical step toward improving responses to gender-based violence\r\nin Pakistan. By promoting gender sensitivity, survivor-centered approaches, and\r\ncollaboration among stakeholders, we can enhance accountability, support\r\nsurvivors, and prevent further violence in our communities.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eAffirmative Action for Gender\r\nEquality: The Imperative of Increasing Female Investigation Officers.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe scarcity of female investigation\r\nofficers in Pakistan is a significant barrier to accessing justice for victims\r\nof gender-based violence (GBV). Female victims may feel more comfortable and\r\nsecure reporting their experiences to female officers, and the lack of such\r\nofficers can deter them from coming forward. This issue is part of a broader\r\nset of challenges within the criminal justice system, which includes a weak\r\nagency for the detection of crimes and inefficient machinery for prosecution,\r\ncontributing to delays in the disposition of criminal cases and a higher\r\npercentage of acquittal orders.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe presence of female investigation\r\nofficers is crucial in handling cases involving women, as it can help ensure\r\nthat the victims are treated with sensitivity and respect. The police rules\r\nemphasize the importance of appropriate treatment of female suspects and\r\nwitnesses, including the requirement that arrests of women should be carried\r\nout by police officers not below the rank of assistant sub-inspector or, in\r\ntheir absence, by a head constable in the presence of responsible male\r\nrelatives and village or town officials. Furthermore, women in police custody\r\nshould not be lodged in a police station overnight except in unavoidable\r\ncircumstances and should be accompanied by a responsible male relative or other\r\nrespectable person during police investigations.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eTo address this issue, it is essential to\r\nrecruit and train more female investigation officers and ensure their\r\navailability across all police stations. This step would not only align with\r\nthe constitutional guarantees of equal protection of the law and\r\nnon-discrimination on the basis of sex 4 but also support the affirmative\r\naction for the protection of women and children as envisaged by the\r\nConstitution of Pakistan.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn summary, the scarcity of female\r\ninvestigation officers is a barrier that needs to be addressed to improve\r\naccess to justice for GBV victims. Ensuring the presence of female officers in\r\nthe police force is a critical step towards creating a more gender-sensitive\r\nand responsive criminal justice system.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eSurvivor Comfort and\r\nTrust\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e: Survivors of gender-based\r\nviolence often feel more comfortable and are more likely to trust female\r\nofficers, especially when disclosing sensitive information or recounting\r\ntraumatic experiences. Female officers can create a safer and more supportive\r\nenvironment for survivors to come forward and seek assistance.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eGender Sensitivity\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e: Female officers are generally more attuned to the\r\nspecific needs and experiences of survivors of gender-based violence. They\r\npossess a deeper understanding of the cultural, social, and gender dynamics\r\nthat contribute to such violence, enabling them to conduct more empathetic and\r\neffective investigations.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eOvercoming Barriers\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e: In many cases, survivors face cultural or\r\nreligious barriers that prevent them from interacting with male officers or\r\ndisclosing incidents of violence. Female officers can help overcome these\r\nbarriers by providing a gender-sensitive response and ensuring survivors feel\r\nheard and understood.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eEnhancing Credibility\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e: Female officers bring added credibility to\r\ninvestigations involving gender-based violence, particularly in cases where\r\nsurvivors may doubt the impartiality or competence of male officers. Their\r\npresence can increase confidence in the investigative process and lead to more\r\nsuccessful outcomes.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;mso-pagination:\r\nnone;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:none;\r\ntext-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003eRole Modeling\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e: By actively participating in investigations and\r\ntaking leadership roles in addressing gender-based violence, female officers\r\nserve as powerful role models for women and girls in their communities. They\r\ninspire confidence and empower others to speak out against violence and seek\r\njustice.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eLegislation for Combating Gender-Based\r\nViolence in Pakistan.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn the year 1996, Pakistan ratified the\r\nU.N Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women\r\n(CEDAW). Under CEDAW, State of Pakistan assumed the obligation to protect women\r\nfrom sexual and other forms of gender-based violence perpetrated by state\r\nagents and private actors alike.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn Pakistan, several legislative measures\r\nhave been enacted to address gender-based violence and promote gender equality.\r\nSome key pieces of legislation include:\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e1.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eProtection of Women (Criminal Laws\r\nAmendment) Act, 2006: \u003c/b\u003eThis law amends various provisions of the Pakistan\r\nPenal Code (P.P.C.) to strengthen legal protections for women against crimes\r\nsuch as rape, acid attacks, honor killings, and domestic violence. It also\r\ncriminalizes practices such as forced marriages and deprivation of inheritance\r\nrights.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e2.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eAcid Control and Acid Crime Prevention\r\nAct, 2011\u003c/b\u003e: This legislation aims to regulate the sale and distribution of\r\nacid and impose stricter penalties for acid attacks. It provides for the\r\nrehabilitation and compensation of acid attack survivors and establishes\r\nspecialized courts to expedite the trial of acid-related offenses.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e3.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eDomestic Violence (Prevention and\r\nProtection) Act, 2013\u003c/b\u003e: This law provides legal mechanisms for the\r\nprevention and protection of victims of domestic violence. It allows for the\r\nissuance of protection orders, restraining orders, and residence orders to\r\nensure the safety and well-being of survivors. It also establishes protection committees\r\nat the district level to facilitate the resolution of domestic violence cases.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e4.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eCriminal Law (Amendment) Act\u003c/b\u003e: This\r\nact introduces amendments to the P.P.C. to strengthen legal protections against\r\nsexual harassment, including workplace harassment. It defines sexual\r\nharassment, prohibits retaliation against complainants, and mandates the\r\nestablishment of internal complaint committees in workplaces.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e5.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eTransgender Persons (Protection of\r\nRights) Act, 2018\u003c/b\u003e: This legislation recognizes the rights of transgender\r\npersons and prohibits discrimination based on gender identity. It provides for\r\nthe establishment of protection committees to address issues faced by\r\ntransgender individuals, including violence, harassment, and discrimination.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e6.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eCybercrime Legislation\u003c/b\u003e: Pakistan has\r\nenacted cybercrime laws, such as the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, to\r\naddress online forms of gender-based violence, including cyberstalking, revenge\r\nporn, and online harassment. These laws criminalize various cyber offenses and\r\nprovide mechanisms for reporting and prosecuting cybercrimes.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e7.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act,\r\n2014:\u003c/b\u003e The Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act 2014, passed by the Provincial\r\nAssembly of Sindh on April 29, 2014, criminalizes child marriages. Under Section\r\n3 of the Act, a male above eighteen years of age who contracts a child marriage\r\ncan face rigorous imprisonment of two to three years and a fine. A\r\n\u0026quot;child\u0026quot; is defined as anyone under eighteen years of age. The Act\r\nalso penalizes those who perform, conduct, or facilitate a child marriage under\r\nSection 4, and parents or guardians who promote, permit, or negligently fail to\r\nprevent a child marriage under Section 5.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e8.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial)\r\nOrdinance, 2020\u003c/b\u003e. In December 2020 the Ordinance was passed with the title\r\n\u0026quot;The Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Ordinance, 2020 so also the\r\namendment was made in the Pakistan Penal Code titled Criminal Law (Amendment)\r\nOrdinance, 2020. The concept of promulgating of both the Ordinances was only to\r\nprovide speedy dispensation of justice to all victims of sexual violence or\r\nrape. The preamble of the Ordinance shows that the said Ordinance was enacted\r\nto ensure expeditious redressal of rape and sexual abuse crimes in respect of\r\nwomen and children through special investigation teams and special Courts\r\nproviding for efficacious procedures, speedy trial, evidence and matters\r\nconnected therewith or incidental thereto. After the lapse of the Ordinance,\r\nthe bill was passed by the Majlis-e Shoora (Parliament) regarding the Anti-Rape\r\n(Investigation and Trial) Act, 2021, and under section 24 of the Act, the\r\nAnti-Rape (Sex Offenders Register) Rules, 2023 have been framed. which also\r\nprovides a full mechanism and provide speedy justice to the victims of sexual\r\nviolence or rape.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe prevalence of gender-based violence\r\n(GBV) against women, along with low reporting and conviction rates in our\r\ncourts, necessitates immediate and thorough examination of the effectiveness of\r\nlegal-judicial processes, as well as societal norms and practices. It is not\r\nacceptable for domestic judicial decisions to exhibit a lack of efficacy and a\r\ncertain degree of tolerance with no discernible preventive or deterrent effect.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eSome of land mark cases Pakistani\r\nCourt Cases Implementing International Law on the subject.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e1.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eMst. Mumtaz Bibi v. Qasim\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e (PLD\r\n2022 Islamabad 228), Justice Babar Sattar of the Islamabad High Court analyzed\r\nthe two schools of thought and declared that irrespective of the branch of law\r\n- i.e., criminal, civil, family and administrative - the age of consent to\r\nenter into a marriage will be 18 years and the defence of an accused in a\r\ncriminal proceeding related to rape and sexual abuse, under sections 375 and\r\n377-A of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (P.P.C.) respectively, shall not be\r\nentertained. He heavily relied on the United Nations Convention on the Rights\r\nof Child, 1989 (UNCRC) in his judgment besides pinpointing the conflicts and\r\ndiscrepancies within different statutory instruments.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e2.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eHafiz Abdul Waheed v. Mrs. Asma\r\nJahangir and another\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e In PLD 1997 Lah. 301, the Lahore High Court\r\naddressed the issue of Saima Waheed\u0027s marriage to Arshad Ahmad, which she\r\nentered into of her own free will, without her father\u0027s consent. The court\r\nultimately held that the marriage could not be declared invalid and that Saima\r\nWaheed was at liberty to reside wherever she pleased, thereby affirming the\r\nright of an adult Muslim woman to marry by her own choice. This decision was a\r\nsignificant step in recognizing women\u0027s autonomy in marriage under Pakistani\r\nlaw.The case raises significant questions about the fundamental rights and\r\nfreedoms of Pakistani women, including their freedom of movement and the right\r\nto marry of their own choice. The father\u0027s counsel argued that according to\r\ntheir religious sect, a woman cannot leave her father\u0027s custody until she is\r\nmarried by him, even if she is legally an adult. However, this view is\r\ncontested by other religious authorities who believe that an adult Muslim woman\r\nis free to marry as she chooses. The case highlights the tension between\r\ntraditional values and the evolving norms of individual freedom and rights in\r\nPakistan.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e3.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eAtif Zareef v. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e PLD\r\n2021 SC 550, wherein the Honorable Supreme Court observed that dragging sexual\r\nhistory of the rape survivor into the case by making observations about her\r\nbody including observations like \u0026quot;the vagina admits two fingers\r\neasily\u0026quot; or \u0026quot;old ruptured hymen\u0026quot; is an affront to the reputation\r\nand honour of the rape survivor and violates Article 4(2)(a) of the\r\nConstitution, which mandates that no action detrimental to the body and\r\nreputation of person shall be taken except in accordance with law. Similarly\r\nArticle 14 of our Constitution mandates that dignity shall be inviolable,\r\ntherefore, reporting sexual history of a rape survivor amounts to discrediting\r\nher independence, identity, autonomy and free choice thereby degrading her\r\nhuman worth and offending her right to dignity guaranteed under Article 14 of\r\nthe Constitution which Right to dignity under Article 14 of the Constitution is\r\nan absolute right and not subject to law.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eNajib Zarab Ltd. v. The Government\r\nof Pakistan\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e PLD 1993 Karachi 93.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e4.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe issue before the Court was whether\r\ninternational law, of its own force and without the aid of municipal/domestic\r\nlegislation, is applicable in Pakistan. The Court held, \u0026quot;[w]e are of the\r\nview that nations must march with the international community and the municipal\r\nlaw must respect rules of international law, even as nations respect\r\ninternational opinion; the community of nations requires that rules of\r\ninternational law may be accommodated in the municipal law even without express\r\nlegislative sanction provided they do not run into conflict with the Acts of\r\nthe Parliament.\u0026quot;\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eMst. Saima v. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e PLD\r\n2003 Lah 747.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:8.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e5.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe question whether petitioners Nos. 1 and\r\n2 were committing an offence within the mischief clause of section 10 of\r\nOrdinance VII of 1979 would require a careful understanding of the penal\r\nprovisions under the said law. [...] In the instant case petitioners Nos. 1 and\r\n2 were of the view that they are validly married. Hence the condition precedent\r\nfor the offence alleged prima facie does not exist. The Court is also conscious\r\nof the protection given to the marriage and the institutions of family under\r\nthe Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the U.N. Convention on\r\nElimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women. Article 35 of the\r\nConstitution enjoins the State to protect the marriage and the family. Article\r\n16 of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against\r\nWomen reads [...] \u0027States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to\r\neliminate discrimination against women in all matters relating to marriage\r\n[...] and in particular shall ensure, on a basis of equality of men and\r\nwomen:-- (a) the same right to enter into marriage, (b) the same right freely\r\nto choose a spouse and to enter into marriage only with their free and full\r\nconsent, (c) the same rights and responsibilities during marriage and at its\r\ndissolution.\u0027 For what has been discussed above, the prosecution launched\r\nagainst the petitioners prima facie reflects not only malice in fact but also\r\nmalice in law.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e6.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eHumaira Mehmood v. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\r\nPLD 1999 Lah 494. In this case of Zina (adultery or illicit intercourse) filed\r\nby a father against his married daughter, the court drew attention to CEDAW\r\nArticle 16 on the right of women to family life on the basis of equality with\r\nmen. Common law has evolved in most common law countries to not requiring the\r\nlegislature to promulgate legislation to adopt/domesticate international\r\ntreaties before its applicability nationally. The case of \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eHumaira Mehmood\r\nv. The State\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e PLD 1999 Lah 494 involved a father filing a case of\r\nadultery against his married daughter. The judge referenced CEDAW Article 16,\r\nemphasizing women\u0027s rights to family life on equal terms with men. The court\r\nnoted that its decision aligned with various international instruments\r\nsafeguarding women\u0027s rights, including CEDAW and the Cairo Declaration on Human\r\nRights in Islam 1990. These documents underscored equality in marriage matters\r\nand the right to consensual marriage, as well as women\u0027s entitlement to human\r\ndignity, civil status, financial independence, and the preservation of their\r\nname and lineage.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e7.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eSarwar Jan v. Abdul Rahman\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e\r\n2004 CLC 1785: In a divorce application by a wife on the basis of cruel and\r\ninhumane behavior of her husband toward her, the court referred approvingly to\r\nCEDAW and the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights 1990.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e*\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eSuo Motu No. 1K of 2006\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e ( 2004 CLC\r\n1785 FSC)\u003cspan style=\u0027mso-spacerun:yes\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003efacts in brief of this case\r\nwere that in an application by a foreign husband for citizenship, the court\r\ndrew on the Constitution, Islamic law, and international human rights law\r\n(i.e., UDHR, CEDAW, and the Convention on Nationality of Married Women). The\r\nFederal Shariat Court, in exercise of its powers under Article 203-D of the\r\nConstitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, took suo motu notice of a news\r\nitem that under the Citizenship Act, 1951, a married Pakistani woman was denied\r\nthe right to get Pakistani citizenship for her foreign husband, while a married\r\nPakistani man was entitled, under section 1014 of the said Act to obtain\r\nPakistan citizenship for his foreign wife. Issue involved was whether gender\r\ndiscrimination in Section l0 of the Citizenship Act is discriminatory and\r\nunconstitutional. The FSC found the discriminatory provision to be contrary to\r\nIslam and invalidated it. In addition, it drew on the Constitution and\r\ninternational human rights law, i.e. the Universal Declaration on Human Rights,\r\nCEDAW, and the Convention on Nationality of Married Women.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e8.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Lahore High Court recently in W.P\r\nNo.32798 of 2023 \u003ci\u003e\u003cu\u003eAzka Wahid v. Province of Punjab and others\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/i\u003e his\r\nLordship Justice Mr. Shahid Karim, addressed a constitutional petition\r\nchallenging the definition of \u0027child\u0027 in the Child Marriage Restraint Act of\r\n1929 vide order dated 09.04.2024. The petition contended that the Act\u0027s\r\ndefinitions, distinguishing between genders with ages under eighteen for males\r\nand under sixteen for females, were unconstitutional due to gender bias. The\r\nCourt considered arguments regarding puberty, gender differences, and\r\nphysiological factors. Ultimately, the Court ruled that the Act\u0027s gender-based\r\nage distinctions were discriminatory and unconstitutional. The Government of\r\nPunjab was directed to revise the Act within fifteen days based on the Court\u0027s\r\njudgment.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e9.\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003cb\u003eBreaking Down Barriers: Ensuring Access\r\nto Justice for Gender-Based Violence Victims.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe barriers to accessing justice for\r\nvictims of gender-based violence (GBV) in Pakistan are multifaceted and deeply\r\nentrenched in societal norms and legal system inefficiencies. Pakistan\u0027s low\r\nranking in terms of gender parity reflects the significant challenges women\r\nface in accessing justice and exercising their rights.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eOne of the primary barriers is the lack\r\nof awareness among women about their rights, coupled with the absence of\r\nsupport or outright disapproval from family members when attempting to seek\r\njustice. This is exacerbated by the patriarchal mindset prevalent in society,\r\nwhich manifests itself at every stage of the legal process, from reporting the\r\ncrime to the police to seeking redress in the courts .\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe judiciary\u0027s role in addressing GBV is\r\ncritical, yet it is hindered by various factors, including problematic\r\ninterpretation and implementation of laws, lack of gender sensitivity, and\r\nunconscious biases among judges. These issues contribute to a lack of confidence\r\nin the police and judicial process, which discourages victims from reporting\r\nGBV cases.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Human Rights Commission of Pakistan\r\nReport, 2013, highlights the grim reality of violence against minorities and\r\nwomen, indicating that constitutional guarantees alone are insufficient to\r\nprotect these groups from violence. This suggests that there are significant\r\ngaps between the constitutional guarantees and their practical realization.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:6.5pt;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eThe Constitution of Pakistan provides for\r\nthe independence of the judiciary and entrusts it with the responsibility of\r\nenforcing fundamental rights, which includes addressing GBV. However, the\r\neffectiveness of the judiciary in this regard is contingent upon its\r\norganization and the efficiency and independence with which it operates.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn the short to medium term, the\r\nimplementation of existing amendments to the Pakistan Penal Code (P.P.C.) and\r\nthe Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) is necessary to provide protection for\r\nwitnesses and shelter for complainants. In the long run, it is crucial to\r\nreview and amend the judicial and prosecutorial training curriculum to make it\r\nmore gender-friendly and to ensure regular training for concerned authorities.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eDespite constitutional provisions aimed\r\nat improving the status of women in society, not all legislative measures and\r\npolicy guidelines are effectively implemented. There are discriminatory\r\nprovisions in the statute book, and issues persist with the enforcement of laws\r\nbeneficial to women, such as those regarding inheritance. Socio-cultural norms\r\noften work against women\u0027s rights and interests, leading to lapses in law\r\nenforcement. \u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003cp class=MsoNormal style=\u0027margin-bottom:.1in;text-align:justify;text-indent:\r\n.2in;mso-pagination:none;page-break-after:avoid;tab-stops:.5in;mso-layout-grid-align:\r\nnone;text-autospace:none\u0027\u003e\u003cspan style=\u0027letter-spacing:.2pt\u0027\u003e\u003cspan\r\nstyle=\u0027mso-tab-count:1\u0027\u003e \u003c/span\u003eIn conclusion, addressing the barriers to\r\naccessing justice for GBV victims in Pakistan requires a multifaceted approach,\r\nincluding legal reforms, enhanced awareness and support for victims, and a\r\nshift in societal attitudes. The judiciary, while independent and responsible\r\nfor upholding fundamental rights, must also evolve to become more efficient,\r\neffective, and sensitive to gender issues to ensure that justice is not only\r\npromised but delivered.\u003co:p\u003e\u003c/o:p\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003c/div\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003c/body\u003e\r\n\r\n\u003c/html\u003e\r\n"